IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PRAKASH PADIA
Satish – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Commissioner Meerut Division Meerut – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content (inside
JUDGMENT :
PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Nipun Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Abhijit Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.3/Land Management Committee and Shri Vinod Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of private-respondents.
2. Pleadings have already been exchanged between the parties, hence with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is decided at the admission stage itself.
3. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners inter-alia with the following prayers-
"i. Issue an order, direction, or writ in the nature of the certiorari quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 03-10-2016 passed by the respondent no. 1 herein ie Additional Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut in revision no. 125/2015-15 Satish and others Vs. Jaipal and others, and revision no 126/2015-15 Harbhajan and others Vs. Ramgopal and others, and revision no. 117/2015-15 Ikram and others Vs Ravindra and others and in Revision no 116/2015-15 Kanwal Singh and others Vs. Raghuraj a
Ram Kumar vs. State of U.P. and Others
Hari Shankar Kushwaha and Ors. vs. State of U.P. and Ors.
Utkal University etc. Vs. Dr. Nrusingha Charan Sarangi and others
Laxminarayan R. Bhattad and others vs. State of Maharashtra and another
Shanti Kumar R. Canji vs. Home Insurance Co. of New York
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India and others
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar Hazi Bashir Ahmad and others
A complaint under Section 198(4) of the U.P. Act can only be initiated by a 'person aggrieved' who has suffered a legal injury, emphasizing that mere residency does not confer such status.
The court ruled that a person must demonstrate a legal grievance to qualify as 'aggrieved' for a writ petition under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, emphasizing enforceable rights ....
The court established that residents can challenge land allotments as 'persons aggrieved' under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, emphasizing the importance of public interest in suc....
The principle of limitation is fundamental in administrative proceedings, and actions taken after substantial delays are unsustainable under law.
The exercise of statutory authority must be within a reasonable period, and fraud vitiates all proceedings.
A landless person can be granted land under the U.P. Bhudan Yagna Act irrespective of their residency in the village where the land is located, as long as there are no eligible landless persons in th....
Point of law: Whenever the Land Management Committee intends to admit any person to land under Section 195 or 197, it shall announce by beat of drum in the circle of the Gaon Sabha in which the land ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.