SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 59

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI
Ajay Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Kumar Tiwari
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.

1. Heard Amit Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Manish Kumar Yadav, learned State Law Officer for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the present application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause of the application. The prayer clause is delineated below:-

"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and quash/set aside the Impugned Cognizance/Summoning order dated 28.05.2025, passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act, Jaunpur as well as to quash/set aside the impugned charge sheet bearing Charge Sheet No. A113/2025 dated 12.04.2025 and also to quash/set aside the entire proceedings of the Special Session Trial No. 207/2025 (State Vs. Akhilesh and others), under section 115(2), 352, 351(2), 117(2) B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act, arising out of case crime no. 74/2025 Police Station- Mungra Badshahpur, District-Jaunpur, against applicant, which is pending in the court of learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Jaunpur."

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, in respect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top