SHAMIM AHMED
Ved Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAMIM AHMED, J.
1. Heard Sri Rishad Murtaza, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Manoj Singh learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the proceedings of Case No. 1004/2019 pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Faizabad under Sections 427, 188 I.P.C. relating to Crime No. 493/2018, Police Station Pura Kalandar, District Faizabad as well as summoning order dated 02.04.2019 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I Faizabad in Case No. 1004/2019, relating to Crime No. 493/2018, under Sections 427, 188 I.P.C. Police Station Pura Kalandar, District Faizabad.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a First Information Report was registered by opposite party No. 2, Police Station Pura Kalandar, District Faizabad under Sections 504, 506, 427, 447 and 379 I.P.C.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that as per the version of the F.I.R. the informant is pairokar of Sri Laxmi Kant Jhunjhunwala and Sri Prakash Chandra Jhunjhunwal who have land situated at Gata No. 383 and in Gata No. 399 th
Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak
Bhushan Kumar and Another vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan vs. State of Maharashtra
H.N. Rishbud vs. State of Delhi
Hussainara Khatoon (I) vs. State of Bihar
Kanti Bhadra vs. State of West Bengal
Menka Gandhi vs. Union of India
P. Ramchandra Rao vs. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.