Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
ALOK MATHUR
Masjid Gaura Sailak Waqf Thru. M/C Treasurer Mohd. Kaleem – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Survey Waqf Commissioner Distt. Magistrate Barabanki Distt. Barabanki – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Sajjad Husain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Krishna Singh, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1 and 2 and Sri Mohammed Hamza on behalf of respondent No.5.
2. The dispute in the present case pertains to mutation of property situated at gata No.s 137/0.840 hectare, 401/0.296 hectare, 397/0.679 hectare total three numbers having a total area of 1.815 hectare of khata No.152 in Village Gaura Sailak, Pargana and Tehsil Fatehpur, District Barabanki. It has been submitted that on the aforesaid land a mosque is existing which is in the name and style of Masjid Gaura Sailak and previously name of Sri Puttu Khan was recorded as Mutwalli as per the order dated 17.7.1979 passed by Tehsildar, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Barabanki. It has been submitted that all the Mutwallis are replaced from time to time and subsequently an application was preferred by one Aqif Kamaal Ayoobi for mutating his name in the revenue records against gata No.s 137/0.840 hectare, 401/0.296 hectare, 397/0.679 situated in Village Gaura Sailak, Pargana and Tehsil Fatehpur, District Barabanki. It has been submitted that recommendations in favour of the appli
Mutation proceedings under U.P. Revenue Code do not determine title or confer ownership; such matters are subject to civil court adjudication, and petitions against mutation orders are generally not ....
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act are summary in nature and do not confer title or extinguish rights. The only way to establish title is through a regular suit for declaration.
Mutation orders require evidence of possession through lawful transfer, and failure to consider possession invalidates such orders.
Mutation proceedings are summary and do not confer title; title must be established in a regular suit.
The rule of exhaustion of statutory remedies has been held to be a rule of policy, convenience and discretion and existence of an alternate remedy would not divest the High Court of its powers under ....
The mandatory reporting of acquisition of legal right and interest within 6 months, the jurisdiction of revenue courts in mutation proceedings, and the principle of estoppel were central legal points....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that mutation proceedings are administrative in nature and do not determine the rights or interest of the parties. The right or title in the proper....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
