IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Deepa Magleena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
1. Heard Mr. R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Yash Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms. Srishti Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Mr. Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
“(a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the record and quashing the impugned order dated 25.02.2025, (Letter No.20827-35/2024-25) passed by respondent no.2.
(b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the record and quashing the impugned suspension order dated 01.03.2025 passed by respondent no.3.
(c) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to ensure payment of withheld salary from 25.06.2024 till date and further the regular salary payable from month to month to the petitioner.
(d) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to pay interest upon the arrears of salary till the date of actual payment.
(e) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent no.3 to reinstate the peti
Pramati Educational Trust Vs. Union of India
TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka
Ahmedabad St. Xavier’s College Vs. State of Gujarat
State of Punjab and Another v. Gurdial Singh and others
State of U.P. v. Jai Bir Singh
Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari
State of Orissa v. Dr. Miss Binapani Dei and others
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another v. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
Sindhi Education Society v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
State of Bihar v. Upendra Narayan Singh and others
Madan Lal and others v. State of J&K and others
Ramesh Chandra Shah and others v. Anil Joshi and others
State of Rajasthan and others v. Daya Lal and others
Ashok Kumar Sharma and others v. Chander Shekhar and another
Bedanga Talukdar v. Saifudaullah Khan and others
P.A. Inamdar and others v. State of Maharashtra and others
A.P. Public Service Commission vs. Koneti Venkateswarulu
R. Vishwanatha Pillai Vs. State of Kerala
All Saints High School v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Appointments obtained through forged documents are void ab initio, and failure to comply with verification processes undermines claims to employment despite long service, reaffirming minority institu....
Fraudulent appointments are void ab initio, and individuals securing employment through deceit cannot claim protections under Article 311 of the Constitution.
The qualifications for appointment must be judged by the rules in force at the time of selection, not by subsequent amendments.
Minorities Educational Institution - Establishment and administration of - Minority Educational Institutions under Article 30(1) of Constitution of India have a right to appoint teaching staff includ....
The eligibility criteria for appointment as an Officiating/Incharge Principal of an Intermediate College recognized and governed under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner, as a teacher in a private school, was entitled to receive salary and continuity of service for the period she worked, and t....
An appointment obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is void ab initio, and procedural safeguards do not apply in such cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.