IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
Deepa Magleena - Petitioners
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others – Respondents
WRIT –A No. -10843 of 2025
Decided On : 17-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's employment history and contract details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's recognition of minority institution rights. (Para 5 , 14 , 28 , 34 , 51) |
| 3. arguments against the arbitrary and illegal actions of respondents. (Para 11 , 12 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 4. legal validity of appointment and fraud implications. (Para 62 , 78 , 104) |
| 5. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 115 , 116) |
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
1. Heard Mr. R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Yash Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms. Srishti Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Mr. Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
“(a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the record and quashing the impugned order dated 25.02.2025, (Letter No.20827-35/2024-25) passed by respondent no.2.
(b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the record and quashing the impugned suspension order dated 01.03.2025 passed by respondent no.3.
(c) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to ensure payment of withheld salary from 25.06.2024 till date and further the regular salary payable from month to month to the petitioner.
(d) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to pay interest upon the arrears of salary till the date of actual payment.
(e) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent no.3 to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefit other services as Assistant Teacher, Hindi (Primary) at St. Joseph Girls High School, Moradabad.
(f) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(g) To award the cost of this petition to the petitioner.”
3. Placing the brief facts of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher of Hindi, (Primary) on 01.07.1991, on a contractual basis, in an Institution, namely, St. Joseph's Girls Junior High School, Civil Lines, Moradabad, (in short ‘the institution’), which is a minority Institution established under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India. The contract of the petitioner was renewed from time to time and was operative without any time gap. The Institution in question came into grant-in-aid list in the year 2015, accordingly, appointments were made in the Institution and the petitioner was issued appointment letter on 26.06.2015. The petitioner took charge as an Assistant Teacher (Hindi) on 01.07.2015 before the Manager of the Institution, an experience certificate has been issued to the petitioner by the Government aided Institution, mentioning that the petitioner has been continuously working in the primary wing and was thereafter appointed in the Junior department as Assistant Teacher (Hindi) on 01.07.2015, thus, it clearly transpires from the experience certificate that the petitioner had been regularly working from 1991 till 2015, and thereafter she was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the aided Institution.
4. On a complaint made by one Ashutosh Chauhan (which has been categorically denied by him through an affidavit) with respect to forged TET certificate of the petitioner being placed for obtaining appointment as Assistant Teacher. Pursuant to which, an inquiry was initiated regarding appointments made by the Manager of the said Institution in collusion with one Anuj Kumar, Principal of Janta Junior High School, Jargaon, Moradabad. Thereafter, respondent no.2, vide letter dated 25.06.2024 sought details from the petitioner with respect to her appointment and proceeded to stop the payment of salary and substance allowance was also not paid to her, therefore, the petitioner filed a Writ Petition No.19101 of 2024 (Deepa Magleena vs. District Basic
Pramati Educational Trust Vs. Union of India
TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka
Ahmedabad St. Xavier’s College Vs. State of Gujarat
State of Punjab and Another v. Gurdial Singh and others
State of U.P. v. Jai Bir Singh
Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari
State of Orissa v. Dr. Miss Binapani Dei and others
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another v. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
Sindhi Education Society v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
State of Bihar v. Upendra Narayan Singh and others
Madan Lal and others v. State of J&K and others
Ramesh Chandra Shah and others v. Anil Joshi and others
State of Rajasthan and others v. Daya Lal and others
Ashok Kumar Sharma and others v. Chander Shekhar and another
Bedanga Talukdar v. Saifudaullah Khan and others
P.A. Inamdar and others v. State of Maharashtra and others
A.P. Public Service Commission vs. Koneti Venkateswarulu
R. Vishwanatha Pillai Vs. State of Kerala
All Saints High School v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Appointments obtained through forged documents are void ab initio, and failure to comply with verification processes undermines claims to employment despite long service, reaffirming minority institu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.