Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Deepa Magleena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's employment history and contract details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's recognition of minority institution rights. (Para 5 , 14 , 28 , 34 , 51) |
| 3. arguments against the arbitrary and illegal actions of respondents. (Para 11 , 12 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 4. legal validity of appointment and fraud implications. (Para 62 , 78 , 104) |
| 5. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 115 , 116) |
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
1. Heard Mr. R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Yash Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms. Srishti Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Mr. Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
“(a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the record and quashing the impugned order dated 25.02.2025, (Letter No.20827-35/2024-25) passed by respondent no.2.
(b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the record and quashing the impugned suspension order dated 01.03.2025 passed by respondent no.3.
(c) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the
Appointments obtained through forged documents are void ab initio, and failure to comply with verification processes undermines claims to employment despite long service, reaffirming minority institu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
