SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 336

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ABDUL SHAHID, J.
Damini – Applicants
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Opposite Parties
Application U/S 529 Bnss No. 4251 of 2025
Decided On : 09-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sanjay Kumar Yadav
For the Opposite Parties : G.A.

The Gram Nyayalaya has jurisdiction to adjudicate maintenance cases under both the Family Courts Act and the Gram Nyayalayas Act, and should handle such matters expeditiously.

Headnote:(A) Family Courts Act, 1984 - Section 7 - Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008 - Section 12 - Jurisdiction of Family Courts and Gram Nyayalayas regarding maintenance - The Court upheld the jurisdiction of Gram Nyayalayas to adjudicate maintenance applications under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and corresponding provisions of B.N.S.S., 2023 (Paras 4, 8, 10).

(B) Expeditious Disposal - The Court directed the Gram Nyayalaya to decide the pending Execution Petition No. 25 of 2024 expeditiously, within six months, underscoring the importance of timely justice (Paras 10, 11).

Facts of the case:
The applicant sought to compel the Gram Nyayalaya to expedite the proceedings related to a maintenance claim against Pankaj Sharma, highlighting prior litigation under Section 125 Cr.P.C., and a subsequent execution petition under Section 147 of B.N.S.S.

Findings of Court:
The Gram Nyayalaya has jurisdiction to resolve maintenance cases and must do so without undue delay.

Issues: The Court addressed whether the Gram Nyayalaya had the authority to determine maintenance issues under relevant legislation.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court affirmed that the Gram Nyayalaya possesses the requisite jurisdiction to adjudicate maintenance petitions under both the Family Courts Act and the Gram Nyayalayas Act, emphasizing the need for timely resolution of such matters.

Result: The application was disposed of with a directive for expeditious adjudication of the execution petition.

Table of Content
1. application for expeditious hearing (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. jurisdiction of family courts and gram nyayalayas (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. gram nyayalaya's authority confirmed (Para 9 , 10)
4. application disposed with directions (Para 11)

JUDGMENT :

ABDUL SHAHID, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned Gram Nyayalayas, Karhal, Mainpuri, to decide the proceedings of Petition No. 25 of 2024 (Damini versus Pankaj Sharma), under Section 147 of the B.N.S.S., Police Station Karhal, District Mainpuri, expeditiously, within a stipulated period.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that Petition No. 217 of 2018 (Damini versus Pankaj Sharma), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., was filed and the same was decided by Sri Rajeev Kumar Pal, Nyayadhikari, on 30.11.2024. Thereafter, the applicant filed Execution Petition No. 25 of 2024 (Damini versus Pankaj Sharma) under Section 147 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, before the same court, wherein the applicant has prayed that the execution petition be decided as expeditiously as possible.

4. Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 defines the jurisdiction as follows:

7. Jurisdiction.—(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall—

(a) have and exercise all the jurisdiction exercisable by any district court or any subordinate civil court under any law for the time being in force in respect of suits and proceedings of the nature referred to in the Explanation; and (b) be deemed, for the purposes of exercising such jurisdiction under such law, to be a district court or, as the case may be, such subordinate civil court for the area to which the jurisdiction of the Family Court extends.

Explanation.—The suits and proceedings referred to in this sub- section are suits and proceedings of the following nature, namely:—

(a) a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage for a decree of nullity of marriage (declaring the marriage to be null and void or, as the case may be, annulling the marriage) or restitution of conjugal rights or judicial separation or dissolution of marriage;

(b) a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the validity of a marriage or as to the matrimonial status of any person;

(c) a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage with respect to the property of the parties or of either of them;

(d) a suit or proceeding for an order or injunction in circumstance arising out of a marital relationship;

(e) a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the legitimacy of any person;

(f) a suit or proceeding for maintenance;

(g) a suit or proceeding in relation to the guardianship of the person or the custody of, or access to, any minor.

(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall also have and exercise—

(a) the jurisdiction exercisable by a Magistrate of the first class under Chapter IX (relating to order for maintenance of wife, children and parents) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974); and

(b) such other jurisdiction as may be conferred on it by any other enactment."

5. Section 12 of the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008, is quoted hereinbelow:

"Criminal Jurisdiction.-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) (corresponding B.N.S.S., 2023) or any other law for the time being in force, the Gram Nyayalaya may take cognizance of an offence on a complaint or on a police report and shall—

(a) try all offences specified in Part I of the First Schedule; and

(b) try all offences and grant relief, if any, specified under the enactments included in Part II of that Schedule.

(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the Gram Nyayalaya shall also try all such offences or grant such relief under the State Acts which may be notified by the State Government under sub-section (3) of section 14."

6. Part II of the First Schedule, as per Sections 12 and 14 of the Act, 2008 (supra), includes clause (v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top