HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ABDUL SHAHID, J.
Damini – Applicants
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Opposite Parties
Application U/S 529 Bnss No. 4251 of 2025
Decided On : 09-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for expeditious hearing (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction of family courts and gram nyayalayas (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. gram nyayalaya's authority confirmed (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. application disposed with directions (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned Gram Nyayalayas, Karhal, Mainpuri, to decide the proceedings of Petition No. 25 of 2024 (Damini versus Pankaj Sharma), under Section 147 of the B.N.S.S., Police Station Karhal, District Mainpuri, expeditiously, within a stipulated period.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that Petition No. 217 of 2018 (Damini versus Pankaj Sharma), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., was filed and the same was decided by Sri Rajeev Kumar Pal, Nyayadhikari, on 30.11.2024. Thereafter, the applicant filed Execution Petition No. 25 of 2024 (Damini versus Pankaj Sharma) under Section 147 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, before the same court, wherein the applicant has prayed that the execution petition be decided as expeditiously as possible.
4. Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 defines the jurisdiction as follows:
7. Jurisdiction.—(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall—
(a) have and exercise all the jurisdiction exercisable by any district court or any subordinate civil court under any law for the time being in force in respect of suits and proceedings of the nature referred to in the Explanation; and (b) be deemed, for the purposes of exercising such jurisdiction under such law, to be a district court or, as the case may be, such subordinate civil court for the area to which the jurisdiction of the Family Court extends.
Explanation.—The suits and proceedings referred to in this sub- section are suits and proceedings of the following nature, namely:—
(a) a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage for a decree of nullity of marriage (declaring the marriage to be null and void or, as the case may be, annulling the marriage) or restitution of conjugal rights or judicial separation or dissolution of marriage;
(b) a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the validity of a marriage or as to the matrimonial status of any person;
(c) a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage with respect to the property of the parties or of either of them;
(d) a suit or proceeding for an order or injunction in circumstance arising out of a marital relationship;
(e) a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the legitimacy of any person;
(f) a suit or proceeding for maintenance;
(g) a suit or proceeding in relation to the guardianship of the person or the custody of, or access to, any minor.
(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall also have and exercise—
(a) the jurisdiction exercisable by a Magistrate of the first class under Chapter IX (relating to order for maintenance of wife, children and parents) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974); and
(b) such other jurisdiction as may be conferred on it by any other enactment."
5. Section 12 of the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008, is quoted hereinbelow:
"Criminal Jurisdiction.-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) (corresponding B.N.S.S., 2023) or any other law for the time being in force, the Gram Nyayalaya may take cognizance of an offence on a complaint or on a police report and shall—
(a) try all offences specified in Part I of the First Schedule; and
(b) try all offences and grant relief, if any, specified under the enactments included in Part II of that Schedule.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the Gram Nyayalaya shall also try all such offences or grant such relief under the State Acts which may be notified by the State Government under sub-section (3) of section 14."
6. Part II of the First Schedule, as per Sections 12 and 14 of the Act, 2008 (supra), includes clause (v
The Gram Nyayalaya has jurisdiction to adjudicate maintenance cases under both the Family Courts Act and the Gram Nyayalayas Act, and should handle such matters expeditiously.
Concurrent jurisdiction between Family Courts and Gram Nyayalaya over maintenance orders creates inconsistencies, and only Family Courts can adjudicate such matters to ensure sufficient legal oversig....
Family Courts Act prevails over Gram Nyayalayas Act, barring Grama Nyayalayas from exercising jurisdiction in areas where Family Courts are established for maintenance cases.
Jurisdiction under the Family Courts Act cannot be altered by administrative directions; valid transfers to Gram Nyayalayas under the Gram Nyayalayas Act affirmed without challenging the latter's pro....
The Gram Nyayalaya does not possess jurisdiction to entertain applications under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, which must be filed before the Judicial First Class Magi....
The Gram Nyayalaya does not have jurisdiction to hear applications under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, necessitating their return to the proper forum.
The jurisdiction for maintenance claims under domestic violence law can be established at the temporary residence of the aggrieved person, allowing for simultaneous proceedings under various statutes....
Maintenance orders can be executed in jurisdictions based on temporary residence, affirming a spouse's right to choose the execution venue under the Code's provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.