SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 359

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
Committee of Management Janta Janardan Shiksha Sadan Inter College Tilaon and another – Petitioners
Versus 
State of U.P. and others – Respondents
WRIT C. No. 1656 of 2026
Decided On : 10-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Chandra Jeet Yadav, Saurabh Tripathi
For the Respondents: Abhyuday Shukla, C.S.C., Satya Prakash Rai, Vashishtha Dhar Shukla, Yogita Shukla

The court maintained that a valid quorum is essential for decision-making in committees, rejecting the notion that the doctrine of necessity can allow decisions in its absence without a genuine impossibility.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Section 16A(7) - Government Order dated 19.12.2000 - Composition of Regional Level Committee - Validity of decisions taken with an incomplete quorum questioned - Court held that the doctrine of necessity cannot substitute requirements for quorum absent impossibility of fulfillment, aimed at ensuring genuine participation of members - Impugned orders set aside due to failure to comply with procedural necessities under the applicable Government Order. (Paras 1, 16, 60)

(B) Administrative Law - Quorum and Decision Making - The essentiality of a quorum is highlighted, noting that the presence of every member is crucial for maintaining transparency and integrity in decision-making - The collective decision-making process is disrupted when a key member’s absence allows one individual to dominate proceedings, thus defeating the purpose of establishing a committee. (Paras 18, 28, 58)

Facts of the case:
The case involves disputes regarding the validity of elections for the Committee of Management of an educational institution in the district of Mirzapur, including challenges to multiple orders regarding election approvals and confirmations by authorities. The key legal issue revolves around the composition and functioning of the Regional Level Committee for managing such disputes. The petitioner contended that recent decisions were made without a complete quorum, invoking procedural norms specified in Government Orders.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the decisions made by the Regional Level Committee in the absence of a member violated the procedural requirements, leading to arbitrary outcomes; hence, orders were quashed and directions were issued for proper compliance with established protocols.

Issues: The legitimacy of decisions made by the Regional Level Committee in the absence of required quorum and whether the doctrine of necessity applies to allow for such decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that strict adherence to quorum is mandated to fulfill the spirit of the law governing the Regional Level Committee’s operations; mere presence of two members cannot equate to lawful decision-making, thereby necessitating a full committee to ensure justice and accordance with procedural safeguards.

Result: Writ petition allowed; impugned orders set aside and directions issued for proper reconstitution of the committee.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The judgment emphasizes that strict adherence to quorum is essential for the Regional Level Committee’s functioning and that decisions made in the absence of a member violate procedural requirements. (!) (!) - It rejects the blanket application of the doctrine of necessity in the absence of impossibility to fulfill the quorum, asserting that such doctrine cannot override the need for full participation unless truly impossible. (!) (!) - The court sets aside the impugned orders due to incomplete quorum and directs nominations from the government or adjournment strategies to ensure proper quorum in future proceedings. (!) (!) (!)

What is the scope and mandatory nature of quorum under Government Order dated 19.12.2000 for the Regional Level Committee?

What is the applicability of the doctrine of necessity or doctrine of silence in case of incomplete quorum for Regional Level Committee decisions?

What remedies or procedures are required when a Regional Level Committee lacks a full quorum to decide disputes, including nominations from the government or transfers to neighboring regions?


Table of Content
1. legal proceedings regarding the management of the institution. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. details on recent elections and decisions affecting management. (Para 11 , 13 , 15 , 16)
3. arguments surrounding quorum and compliance with the government order. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. analysis of implications of the government order. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. discussion on the doctrine of necessity and its application. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
6. counterarguments to the invocation of necessity doctrine. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
7. judicial precedents on quorum and decision-making. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
8. examining dissent as essential to decision-making. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
9. the implications of not achieving full membership in committees. (Para 41 , 42 , 43)
10. final considerations on managing quorum issues. (Para 44 , 45 , 46)
11. final orders and directives of the court. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)

JUDGMENT :

SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

1. With the consent of the parties, since the question is purely legal in nature, the present writ petition is being decided at the admission stage.

2. Heard Shri Prabhaker Awasthi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Saurabh Tripathi, Advocate and Shri Chandra Jeet Yadav, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner. Shri R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Satya Prakash Rai, Advocate and Shri Vashishtha Dhar Shukla, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.5 and Shri Kartikeya Saran, learned Additional Advocate General along with learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

3. The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:

“ i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash the impugned order dated 08.08.2025 passed by the Regional Level Committee, respondent no. 2 (Annexure no. 1 to the writ petition).

ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash the impugned order dated 02.09.2025 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Mirzapur, (Annexure no. 2 to the writ petition).

iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner Committee of Management to continue to discharge day-to-day affairs of the Institution on the strength of valid election having been held on 24.07.2024 which has been approved by the District Inspector of Schools on 26.07.2024.”

4. Shri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned Senior Counsel has assailed the order dated 08.08.2025 to submit that in District Mirzapur, a society in the name and style of “Janta Janardan Shiksha Samiti”, was registered under the provisions of Societies Registration Act, 1860 Act,1860 in the year 1973.

5. The aforesaid society initially established a Junior High School, which was subsequently upgraded as High School and thereafter as an Intermediate School. The Junior High School was under grand-in-aid and the High School Section and Intermediate, is not under the grand-in-aid of the State Government.

6. Certain dispute arose, with respect to the Committee of Management, which led to filing of various writ petitions and eventually vide order dated 19.09.2017 passed in Lal Chandra Singh vs. State of U.P. and others , Writ-C No.43742 of 2017. this Court found that the parties are at variance, as to whether, there has been a determination of the Members of the General Body of the Society; and as contemplated by Section 4B of the Act, pursuant to the directions given by this Court in Writ-C No.25100 of 2017, vide order dated 19.09.2017, the writ petition was disposed of, by requiring the Regional Level Committee to examine, whether there has been a determination of the General Body as contemplated by Section 4B of the Act or not.

7. In compliance of the observations made by this Court, the Regional Level Committee proceeded to pass an order dated 20.12.2017, discarding the election dated 09.04.2017; which was a subject m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top