Archana vs State of U.P. - 2026 Supreme(All) 550

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(All) 550

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI
Archana – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionists : Uttam Singh.
For the Opposite Parties : Bhavesh Singh Jadaun, G.A., Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun.

JUDGMENT :

PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.

1. Heard Sri Uttam Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Bhavesh Singh Jadaun, learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the instant criminal revision has been preferred with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause. The relief mentioned in the prayer clause of the revision is delineated below:-

"The relief sought by the present Criminal Revision is that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the interim maintenance Order dated 07.02.2025 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, District Kanpur Dehat in Case No.97 of 2024 (Archana and another Vs. Amardeep) under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by which Ld. Principal Judge Family Court Kanpur Dehat has granted the interim maintenance Rs.1000/- per month to the only revisionist no.1 and nothing has been granted to the Minor Child Revisionist No.2 so enhance the interim maintenance in favor of the Revisionist No.1 Rs.15000/- in place of the Rs.1000/- per month and also grant the interim maintenance to the minor child revisionist no.2 Rs.5000/- per month from the date of the appl