SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 247

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Sheetal Vadia – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Vadia – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Kumar Sharma for applicants;
Surendra Kumar Gupta for respondent.

ORDER

1. The revisionist has assailed the order dated 28.6.2019 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ujjain in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.11/2019 by which the revisionist’s application for interim maintenance has been allowed and only Rs.11,000/- per month has been awarded to the revisionist (Rs.10,000/- to revisionist No.1 and Rs.1,000/- to revisionist No.2). Hence, this petition for enhancement of the maintenance amount has been filed by the revisionist-wife.

2. The facts in nutshell are that revisionist No.1-wife and revisionist No.2 minor daughter of revisionist No.1 and the respondent filed an application under section 125 of Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance alongwith the application for interim maintenance. Respondent is working as Executive Engineer in MPGCL, Gandhi Sagar, Mandsaur and is an government employee. The learned Family Court awarded Rs.11,000/- as maintenance to the revisionists.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionists submits that respondent/husband was earning more than Rs.95,000/- per month in the month of December, 2018 and pay slip of month of December, 2018 is on record. As per the pay slip his gross salary is Rs.95,360/- and net salary Rs.75,576/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top