IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Rajesh Singh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Pal Singh Yadav, the learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Mohd. Asif Khan, the learned AGA-I for the State.
2. By means of the instant appeal filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C., the appellant has challenged the validity of a judgment and order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the Special Judge, POCSO Act/Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Lucknow in Session Trial No.869 of 2015 titled State v. Rajesh Singh Rathore arising out of Case Crime No.259 of 2015 under Section 376 IPC and 5/6 of POCSO Act registered at Police Station-Krishna Nagar, District- Lucknow.
3. The aforesaid case was instituted on the basis of an FIR lodged on the basis of a written complaint given by the appellant's wife on 20.07.2015 stating that the appellant had repetitively committed the misdeed against her daughter aged 9 years. The daughter had informed her that the appellant commits penetrative intercourse and bites on her private parts.
4. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she stated that her father (the appellant) used to insert his finger in her vagina. She stated that blood was coming out of her vagina while urinati
The court affirmed that the victim's testimony, corroborated by DNA evidence, is sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases, emphasizing the need for sensitivity in evaluating such evidence.
Rape – Conviction and sentence must be upheld where victim’s testimony is not only consistent but fairly detailed also.
In sexual assault cases involving minors, the victim's testimony holds significant weight and need not be corroborated unless substantial reasons exist; even minimal penetration suffices to establish....
The significance of scientific evidence, including DNA matching, in establishing guilt under the POCSO Act.
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, with sufficient and credible evidence; failure to do so invalidates a conviction.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the quality of evidence is essential in criminal law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.