Back
SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
BHUPESH AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
The petitioners, in paragraph no. 1, of the writ petition have made the following pleading:
“1. That the petitioners being aggrieved by the order dated 21.05.2018 allegedly passed in Case No. 27 under Rule 109(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and the order dated 01.02.2001 passed by respondent no. 3 and further the order dated 23.08.2017 passed by respondent no. 2 whereby the land of petitioners has been recorded in the name of State Government and further recording the name of private respondent no. 5 as Class-4 tenure, are desirous to challenge the same invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Hon'ble High Court invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India of following facts and circumstances hereunder. True and correct copy of the khatauni is being marked and annexed as Annexure No. 1."
2. Apparently, as pleaded, the petitioners seem to challenge the order dated 21.05.2018 passed in Case No. 27 under Rule 109 (1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, which happens to be the process of enforcing the order passed by the Consolidation Authorities on merits; as well as challenge is also made to the order dated 23.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
