SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
RAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SARVESH KUMAR MITTAL – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
These are two writ petitions, which engage consideration of a common question of fact and law, hence they are being decided together.
(A) In Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1914 of 2019, Ram Singh Vs. Sarvesh Kumar Mittal, the challenge given by the petitioner, is to the order dated 30.05.2019, as passed on his application paper No. 15 (Ga), which was preferred by him in Rent Control Appeal No. 14 of 2018, as well as the order dated 30.05.2019, yet again as passed in Rent Control Appeal No. 14 of 2018, in the said Rent Control Appeal, whereby paper No. 20(ga) has been rejected and as a consequence thereto, the application under Order 41 Rule 27, to be read with Application under Sections 151/152 of CPC has been rejected by the Additional District Judge, Ram Nagar, District Nainital.
(B) Whereas, the connected Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1803 of 2019, Nandan Singh and others Vs. Sarvesh Kumar Mittal, the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders of the like date i.e. 30.05.2019, passed in Rent Control Appeal No. 13 of 2018, whereby an application paper No. 16(ga) has been rejected, as well as the order of the like date whereby application paper No. 21
Kalisaran Vs. Bhagwan Singh & Anr
National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences Vs. C. Parameshwara
State of Gujarat & anr Vs. Mahendrakumar Parshottambhai Desai (Dead) by LRs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.