UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 723 of 2021
GIRISH KUMAR – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. – Respondent
WITH Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1351 of 2017
GIRISH KUMAR – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. – Respondent
WITH Writ Petition (S/S) No. 2169 of 2018
GIRISH KUMAR – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. – Respondent
WITH Contempt Petition No. 305 of 2020
GIRISH KUMAR – Petitioner
Versus
R.K. KUNWAR – Respondent
Decided on : 13.07.2021
Promotion – Petition filed by petitioner before High Court – He stated that he was appointed on post of Lecturer (Physics) on ad hoc basis – Posted in different Government Intermediate College – He has represented his case for seeking his transfer to some other institution – Petition disposed by Co-ordinate Bench of High Court to decide representation of petitioner, treating him to be a patient of asthma so that he may be placed at a suitable conducive place, which may suit to his physical problem, which he was suffering from – Determination of – Representation was already taken by respondent – Which was not challenged by petitioner – True facts are not placed before Court – A direction is issued to decide representation of petitioner, that in itself would be an order which has been procured by not bringing true facts on record before Court – A decision already taken on 3.11.2019 and 22.2.2020 by Director – Petitioner has concealed facts and has mislead the Court – Petition dismissed. (Paras 2 and 36)
inksUufr & ;kfpdkdÙkkZ }kjk mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k ;kfpdk nkf[ky & mlus ;g dFku fd;k fd mls rnFkZ vk/kkj ij izoDrk ¼HkkSfrdh½ ds in ij fu;qDr fd;k x;k Fkk fofHkUu ‘kkldh; b.VjehfM,V dkWyst esa fu;qDr & mlus fdlh vU; laLFkku dks vius vUrj.k dks okaNk djrs gq, vius ekeys dk izfrfuf/kRo fd;k & ;kfpdk mPp U;k;ky; dh ,d leUo; ihB }kjk ;kfpdkdÙkkZ dks vLFkek dk jksxh ekurs gq, mlds izR;kosnu ij fu.kZ; djus ds fy, fuLrkfjr & ftlls fd mls mfpr lgk;d LFky ij j[kk tk lds tks mldh ‘kkjhfjd leL;k ds fy, mfpr gks ftlls og ihfM+r gS & voèkkj.k & izR;kosnu ij foi{kh }kjk igys gh fopkj fd;k x;k & ftls ;kfpdkdÙkkZ }kjk pqukSrh ugha nh xbZ Fkh & U;k;ky; ds le{k lgh rF; ugha j[ks x;s & ;kfpdkdÙkkZ ds izR;kosnu dks fu.khZr djus ds fy, funsZ’k tkjh fd;k tkrk gS fd tks Lo;a og vkns’k gksxk ftls U;k;ky; ds le{k vfHkys[k ij lgh rF;ksa dks u ykdj izkIr fd;k x;k gS & funs’kd }kjk fnukad 3-11-2019 o 22-2-2020 dks igys gh fu.kZ; fy;k tk pqdk gS & ;kfpdkdÙkkZ us rF;ksa dks fNik;k gS vkSj U;k;ky; dks xqejkg fd;k gS & ;kfpdk [kkfjtA ¼izLrj 2 o 36½
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
(Via Video Conferencing)
Before this Court deals with the vitalities of the arguments, which has been extended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as it has engaged consideration in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 723 of 2021, it becomes inevitable for the Court to deal with the manner in which the sincerity and honesty with which the petitioner has pursued his matter before this Court.
2. Before venturing to give the details of chain of litigation, this Court feels it to be appropriate to observe, that this is the six writ petitions in succession for almost the principal relief and cause of action, seeking promotion initially on the post of lecturer and subsequently thereafter on the post of Headmaster. The petitioner had filed a Writ Petition being Writ Petition (S/S) No. 463 of 2017, Girish Kumar Vs. State and others, before this Court on 29.03.2017, in which, briefly, he has stated that he was appointed on the post of Lecturer (Physics) on ad-hoc basis, as back as on 17.07.1990, and thereafter, he was posted in different Government Intermediate Colleges, situated in hilly areas; but, because of certain diseases, which he was suffering from, he has represented his case for seeking his transfer to some other institution and consequently, he contends that as a result of the appointment he was working as a Lecturer (Physics) in the Government Inter College, Manan, Almora.
3. The contention of the petitioner is that since his grievance was not being redressed, he had earlier also filed a writ petition being Writ Petition (S/S) No. 175 of 2010, which was disposed of by the coordinate Bench of this Court, to decide the representation of the petitioner, treating him to be a patient of asthma so that he may be placed at a suitable conducive place, which may suit to his physical problem, which he was suffering from.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the respondent No. 7, had issued a Circular for transfer of the Lecturers and since his claim for being posted at the suitable place, according to his contentions raised in his representation dated 24.11.2016, was not being considered by the respondent, hence the petitioner had filed the Writ Petition (S/S) No. 463 of 2017, wherein the petitioner had prayed for the following reliefs:-
“i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 1 to pass the order of promotion showing the suitable place of posting in the Government Colleges of District Udham Singh Nagar or District Haridwar or plain area of District Nainital or plain area of District Dehadun looking the ailing condition of the petitioner.
ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no. 1 & 2 to decide the case of the petitioner dated 24.11.2016 within two weeks or before declaring the result of promotion list of Head Master for teaching High School classes.
iii) Issue any other writ or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
iv) Award the cost of petition to the petitioner."
5. In fact, in a nutshell, if the backgrounds of the aforesaid writ petition are taken into consideration, it is an aspect of transfer which the petitioner apparently was seeking on account of the physical conditions; but, in the relief clause, the mandamus, which was sought for by the petitioner for the respondent No. 1 was, to pass a suitable order of promotion posting him at a suitable place. He had further prayed for a writ of mandamus, to the respondents to decide the case of the petitioner, as agitated by him in the representation dated 24.11.2016 before the Director, School Education, praying for redressal of his grievance to the following effect:-
^^vr% Jh jkeÑ".k iqfu;ky vij funs'kd ¼ek/;fed f'k{kk½ xढoky e.My ikSM+h ds vuqlkj inksUufr ij dksbZ izHkko@vlj ugha gksA vr% mijksDrkuqlkj vkils fouez fuosnu gS fd esjh inksUufr ugha jksdh t
G. Narayanaswamy Reddy (dead) by L.Rs. & anr Vs. Government of Karnataka & anr
Udyami Evam Khadi Gramodyog Welfare Sanstha & anr Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & ors
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's inherent power to review a judgment and order if it is found to be inconsistent and inoperative, based on the precedent set by AIR 1963....
Second writ petition against same order not maintainable when prior one dismissed for non-compliance with peremptory defect-removal orders; litigant's casual conduct constitutes misuse of process, pr....
Promotions mandated by previous court rulings must be implemented without discrimination, ensuring rights are upheld as per governing laws.
High Court is exercising discretionary and extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. Over and above, a court of law is also a court of equality.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.