RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Haresh Ram – Appellant
Versus
Sheela Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravindra Maithani, J.
Instant revision is preferred against the judgement and order dated 26.04.2019, passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 262 of 2017, Smt. Sheela Devi and others Vs. Haresh Ram, by the Judge, Family Court, Nainital (“the case”). By it, an application filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”) by the respondent no.1, the wife, seeking maintenance for herself and her two minor children, namely, Ms. Lakshita, respondent no.2 and Master Yashdeep, respondent no.3. has been allowed. The revisionist has been directed to pay Rs.15,000/- per month to the respondent no. 1, Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent no.2 and Rs.5,000/- to respondent no.3 as maintenance.
2. Facts necessary to appreciate the controversy, briefly stated, are in a very short compass. The revisionist and respondent no.1 married on 28.11.2004. They stayed together for a long. But, when the dispute arose, they started living separate. Two minor children, respondent nos. 2 and 3 are staying with the mother, the respondent no.1. The respondent no.1 filed an application under Section 125 of the Code seeking maintenance on the ground that she has to maintain her two
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.