Manish Kumar vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(UK) 680

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Manish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist :Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, Advocate, Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. V.S. Rawat, Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate, Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari

JUDGMENT :

Since, both these revisions arise from one and the same judgement, they are heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

2. In this judgment reference to revisionists and respondents shall correspond to Criminal Revision No.413 of 2019.

3. The challenge in these revision is made to the order dated 04.05.2019, passed in Criminal Case No.03 of 2016, Smt. Nisha Kashyap vs. Manish Kumar, by the court of Judge, Family Court, Haridwar (“the case”), by which, an application filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”) by the respondent no.2 (“the wife”), seeking maintenance for herself and respondent no.3 (“minor daughter”) has been allowed and the revisionist has been directed to pay Rs.12,000/- per month to the wife and Rs.8,000/- per month the minor daughter, as maintenance.

4. In Criminal Revision No. 413 of 2019, the revisionist has sought quashing of impugned judgment and order, passed in the case and in Criminal Revision No.259 of 2019, the respondent nos.2 and 3 have sought enhancement of the compensation granted them in the case.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. The case is based on an applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document