IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
VIPIN SANGHI, R.C. KHULBE, JJ.
Yogendra Singh Chauhan - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others - Respondents
Special Appeal No. 147 of 2017
Decided On : 15-09-2022
Educational Qualification - Computer Certificate Course - [25. lgk;d HkaMkjh] - [1- baVjehfM,V lkbal (Physics, Chemistry & Maths) fo"k; ls mrh.kZ ,oa 2- ekU;rk izkIr fo'ofo|ky;@laLFkku ls Lukrd mrh.kZ gksuk ,oa 3- mRrjk[kaM 'kklu ls ekU;rk izkIr daI;wVj laLFkku ls 1 o"kZ dk daI;wVj lfVZfQdsV dkslZ ,oa 4- daI;wVj ij fganh vFkok vaxzsth esa U;wure 4000 dh& fMizs'ku@?kaVk Vad.k dh xfrA] - The court discussed the essential educational/ technical qualification for the post of Assistant Store Keeper, emphasizing the requirement of a one year computer certificate course from a recognized computer institute as recognized by the Uttarakhand Government. The court highlighted the conditions imposed in the advertisement and the clarification provided by the Government of Uttarakhand regarding the recognition of certificate courses. It emphasized the importance of the stipulation as an essential qualification to ensure the credibility of the certificate and prevent candidates from obtaining certificates from unregulated institutions.
Fact of the Case:
The court considered a case where the learned Single Judge set aside the selection of the appellant for the post of Assistant Store Keeper on the ground that he did not possess the minimum essential educational/ technical qualification from an institution recognized by the State Government. The respondent no.5 was directed to be granted appointment as Assistant Storekeeper since he was at Sl. No.2 in the merit list.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant did not obtain the certificate of undergoing the one year computer course from a recognized institution, and therefore, was rightly held to be disqualified by the learned Single Judge. The court also dismissed the special appeal, stating that the recognition granted in respect of the one year certificate course obtained from an institution recognized by the U.P. Board of Technical Education did not lose its efficacy due to the setup of the Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education.
Issues: The issues revolved around the recognition of educational qualifications for the post of Assistant Store Keeper, specifically the requirement of a one year computer certificate course from a recognized computer institute as recognized by the Uttarakhand Government.
Ratio Decidendi: The essential qualification of a one year computer certificate course from a recognized computer institute, as recognized by the Uttarakhand Government, was deemed essential and could not be waived. The court emphasized the importance of this stipulation to ensure the credibility of the certificate and prevent candidates from obtaining certificates from unregulated institutions.
Final Decision: The special appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the learned Single Judge to set aside the selection of the appellant for the post of Assistant Store Keeper.
JUDGMENT :
Vipin Sanghi, J.
The present Special Appeal is directed against the order dated 17.04.2017, rendered by the learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition (S/S) No.1862 of 2016, preferred by the respondent no.5 herein Mr. Manoj Kumar.
2. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge allowed the said writ petition, and set-aside the selection of the appellant herein, who was respondent no.5 in the writ petition, on the ground that he did not possess the minimum essential educational/ technical qualification from an institution recognized by the State Government, and directed that the writ petitioner Mr. Manoj Kumar be granted appointment as Assistant Storekeeper since he was at Sl. No.2 in the merit list. The impugned order is a short order, and reads as follows:-
There is no material placed on record to establish that the Uttaranchal Computer Training Institute is duly recognized by the Government of Uttarakhand. Merely that Society is registered under the Societies Registration Act or under the Local Act would not suggest even remotely that Institution is recognized by the State Government. The candidate must possess the essential educational/ technical qualification as provided by the Recruitment or Promotional Rules or in the advertisement. The respondent no.5 did not possess the minimum essential educational/ technical qualification from the institution recognized by the State Government.
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The selection of respondent no.5 to the post of Assistant Store Keeper is quashed and set-aside. The respondents are directed to issue appointment letter to the petitioner, who was at Sl. No.2 in the merit list within a period of eight weeks from today.”
3. The submission of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant is that, in fact, the State Government does not provide any recognition to an educational/ training institution which grants a one year certificate course in computer training.
4. The further submission of the learned Senior Counsel is that the respondent no.5 Mr. Manoj Kumar did not have the requisite qualification as laid down in the advertisement, inasmuch as, he had been granted the one year diploma by Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology for Handicapped, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, in the year 2005, whereas the Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education had been setup by an Act of 2003. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the stand taken by the respondent-authority is that they continued to recognize the diplomas which were recognized by the Uttar Pradesh Board of Technical Education before the creation of the Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education and, therefore, the diploma obtained by respondent no.5 could not have been accepted as a validly recognized diploma, since the same was obtained only in the year 2005.
5. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that since the Uttaranchal Computer Training Institute-wherefrom the appellant obtained the certificate of undertaking one year certificate course in Computer Applications (from 01.04.2005 to 30.03.2006), is a duly registered society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, that, by itself, tantamounts to recognition by the State of the certificate course undergone by the appellant.
6. O
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of the essential qualification of a one year computer certificate course from a recognized computer institute, as recognized by th....
The court upheld the essential qualification for the post of Additional Private Secretary in Uttarakhand and dismissed the petitioners' claim of vagueness in the essential qualification and their del....
Possession of a higher qualification does not necessarily make one eligible for a post requiring a lower qualification, as the specific educational requirements outlined in the relevant rules must be....
Employers can prescribe qualifications for recruitment but cannot arbitrarily exclude valid certificates, particularly those recognized by law.
The court affirmed that the equivalence of educational qualifications is a matter of State determination, limiting judicial review, while ensuring that unfilled vacancies warrant reconsideration of c....
(1) Diploma through distance education cannot be equated with Diploma given through regular class room studies.(2) Equivalence is a technical academic matter. It cannot be implied or assumed. Judicia....
Equivalent Degree – Entitlement for appointment - Candidate who can provide conclusive evidence that he/she has educational qualification or experience at least equal to what is required by the minim....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.