ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Harish Kapri – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The applicant-accused Harish Kapri has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the charge-sheet and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 352 of 2022, “State vs. Shubham Kapri and Another”, pending before the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pithoragarh.
2. After completion of the investigation, chargesheet was filed. The trial court took cognizance and passed the summoning order under Sections 307, 504 and 506 of I.P.C. against the present applicant.
3. Heard Mr. Amit Kapri, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S.S. Adhikari, the learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. B.S. Thind, the learned Brief Holder for the State.
4. The learned counsel for the applicant-accused submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated. According to the medical report, there were simple injuries on the head of the alleged victim and according to the Doctor, the said injuries were caused by hard and blunt object, and, at the time of medical examination, it was found that the alleged victim had consumed alcohol and was intoxicated. The learned counsel for the applicant further submitt
Madhu Limaya Vs. State of Maharashtra
Pepsi Food Limited vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Others
Lee Kun Hee and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others
Shakson Belthissor vs. State of Kerala and another
M/s. Neeharika Infrastructure Private Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Kaptan Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.