SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 432

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Jyoti Taragi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vinod Tiwari, Advocate, N.P. Sah, Advocate, V.S. Rawat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Alok Kumar Verma, J. - This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider/amend the place of promotion of the petitioner, namely Jyoti Taragi, on the post of Headmistress at Government Primary School Laukote, Block Bikihyasen, District Almora, like others whose promotional place were amended by the respondents.

2. Heard Mr. Vinod Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.P.Sah, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Mr. V.S. Rawat, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. During the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition may be decided by directing the respondent no.2/District Education Officer, Almora, District Almora to decide his representations dated 04.10.2022 and 15.102022 (Annuexure Nos. 2 and 4).

4. Learned counsel for the State requested three weeks' time to decide the said representations.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top