JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - The challenge in this revision is made to order dated 26.07.2013, passed in Criminal Case No.2227 of 2013, State Vs. Siddharth Lamba and Another, by the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar ('the case').

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Facts necessary to appreciate the controversy, briefly stated, are as follows: the respondent no.2 ('the informant') filed an FIR (FIR No. 215 of 2012) on 09.08.2012 against the revisionists for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. In this FIR, after investigation, chargesheet under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC was submitted against the revisionists and cognizance was taken, which is the basis of the case. The order dated 26.07.2013 was challenged by the revisionists in C-482 No.667 of 2013 ('the petition'). The petition was decided on 11.07.2013. In fact, it was withdrawn with certain liberties. At the stage of framing of charge, an application was moved for discharge. It has been rejected by the impugned order.

4. In the instant case, before the