SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 32

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Omveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant Omveer Singh is in judicial custody in FIR No. 31 of 2021, under Sections 342, 376-D, 120-B IPC and Sections 3, 4, 16, 17 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Clementown, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is argued that co-accused has already been granted bail. The victim has already been examined at trial. She has not supported the prosecution case. These facts have not been denied by the learned State counsel.

4. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

5. The bail application is allowed.

6. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top