Back
VIPIN SANGHI, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Pachhuwadoon Bar Association – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Kumar Bartwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
Issue notice.
Counsel for the respondents appear and accept notice.
2. The present special appeals are directed against the common order passed by the learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition (M/s) No. 2507 of 2022, Writ Petition (M/s) No. 2043 of 2022, and Writ petition (M/s) No. 284 of 2023. The two appeals before us have arisen out of WPMS No. 2507 of 2022, and WPMS No.284 of 2023.
3. The impugned order reads as follows :-
Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for respondent No. 1.
Ms. Manisha Bhandari, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
Mr. Narayan Dutt, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of WPMS No. 2507 of 2022 are being considered. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 01.09.2022 passed by respondent no. 1 (contained as Annexur
Jurisdiction of Bar Council and Societies Registration Act, 1860
The Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India cannot entertain appeals without prior punishment being imposed by the State Bar Council, rendering subsequent orders non-est.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of statutory immunity under Section 48 of the Advocates Act and the doctrine of merger, which resulted in the plaintiff's lack of c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
