Vijay Singh vs Jaimalti - 2023 Supreme(UK) 407

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(UK) 407

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jaimalti – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Mr. R.C. Tamta, learned counsel.
For the Respondent: Mr. Basant Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel.

JUDGMENT :

This criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist against the judgment and order dated 05.02.2013, passed by the learned Family Judge, Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Criminal Case No. 257 of 2010, Smt. Jaimalti Vs. Vijay Singh, whereby the application moved by the respondent – wife – Jaimalti, under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “the Code”) has been partly allowed and the revisionist – husband – Vijay Singh, was directed to pay a sum of Rs.1500/- per month to the respondent – wife from the date of moving the application for the maintenance and to ensure to make payment on the seventh day of each month.

2. The instant revision is moved against the aforesaid judgment and order dated 05.02.2013, mainly, on the ground that the maintenance amount awarded by the learned Family Judge, to the respondent – wife is excessive and beyond the paying capacity of the revisionist, as he is just a labour.

3. I have perused the impugned judgment as well as the material available on record. It is admitted to both the parties that their marriage had been solemnized on 16.02.2010, as per the Hindu rites and rituals and after some time, a discord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document