MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, VIVEK BHARTI SHARMA
Chaitanya Kandpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following substantive reliefs:
(i) a issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and quashing the annexure-12 order dated 12.07.2023 issued on behalf of the 1st respondent.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the State Govt. (respondent no. 1) to issue appointment order in favour of the petitioner against the vacancy of the post of ACF that remained unfilled in the ACF Examination 2019.
(iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of prohibition restraining the State Govt. from carrying forward and supplying the unfilled vacancy of Assistant Conservator of Forest requisitioned to the Commission for the ACF Examination 2019 during the pendency of the present writ petition.”
2. Petitioner responded to an advertisement dated 30.07.2019 issued by Uttarakhand Public Servic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.