SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 421

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Rohit Pande – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) :

Applicant Rohit Pande is in judicial custody in FIR No.343 of 2023, under Section 307, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station- Ramnagar, District- Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. This is the second bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.2337 of 2023, was rejected on 12.12.2023.

4. According to the FIR, on 28.07.2023, at 2.05 PM, the applicant fired at the informant and his friends, and, thereafter, he left the scene of occurrence while threatening the informant to life.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the injured has not supported the prosecution case at trial, and other witnesses have also not supported the prosecution case.

6. Learned State Counsel admits this fact.

7. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

8. The bail application is allowed.

9. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top