SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 451

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Sahil – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Mohd. Safdar.
For the State : Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

Applicant Sahil is in judicial custody in FIR No. 305 of 2023, under Section 376, 376 (2), 511, 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Rishikesh, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, the applicant and the informant both were known to each other. On 24.06.2023, the applicant visited the house of the informant and pressurised her for marriage and also tried to establish physical relation with her. The informant resisted to it, but the FIR records that thereafter, the applicant abused and did maarpeet with the informant and also threatened her to life.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant and the informant, both are major. They were in relationship. The informant was married, but when she had discarded her matrimonial life. The informant wanted the applicant to marry her, but since the informant was not divorced from her earlier husband, the applicant declined to marry. Therefore, instant FIR has been lodged.

5. Learned State counsel would submit that the victim has supported the prosecution case during investigation.

6. I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top