SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(UK) 7

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J., SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
State of Uttarakhand & Others – Appellants
Versus 
Dr. Mehul Singh Gunjyal & others – Respondents
Special Appeal No. 01 of 2023
Decided On : 24-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel.
For the Respondents: Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi and Mr. Tushar Upadhyaya, learned counsel.

The court ruled that medical graduates on subsidized education must adhere to bond service conditions, allowing prior service to be adjusted against required bond tenure.

Headnote:(A) Government Order dated 23.07.2008 - Bond obligations for medical graduates - Petitioners who availed subsidized education must render service as specified, with adjustments for prior service allowed under certain conditions (Par. 7-13).

(B) Appeal clarified the conditions under which bond recovery would proceed, reaffirming the state's rights without prejudice to the petitioners. (Par. 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners completed MBBS on subsidized fees and sought adjustment of prior service from their bond period after gaining admission to P.G. courses.

Findings of Court:
The bond conditions remain enforceable, with adjustments for prior service recognized. (Par. 13)

Issues: Clarification of bond conditions and adjustment of bond service for prior work.

Ratio Decidendi: The State's right to recover bond money is preserved even if petitioners fail to serve post-P.G. However, previous service shall be accounted for in bond tenure.

Result: Special appeal disposed of.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - Medical graduates who completed their MBBS on subsidized fees were required to sign a bond to serve in hilly areas of the State [4]. - Under the Government Order dated 23.07.2008, candidates are required to render three years of service after completing their Post Graduation [8][9]. - The Court clarified that service rendered after MBBS but before PG admission must

How should the period of service rendered by medical graduates after MBBS but before PG admission be adjusted against the mandatory bond service tenure?

What are the rights of the State Government to recover bond money if medical graduates fail to complete the required service after their PG course?


Table of Content
1. conclusion and order of the court (Para 1 , 14 , 15)
2. adjustment of service period in bond (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. government bond conditions clarified (Para 8 , 9)
4. state's right to recover bond (Para 10 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.

Delay Condonation Application (I A No. 02 of 2023)

1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, filed in support of the delay condonation application, the delay condonation application is allowed and delay of 127 days in filing the special appeal is condoned.

Special Appeal No.01 of 2023

2. Heard learned State Counsel and learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents- writ petitioners.

3. The present intra-court appeal is directed against the order of learned Single Judge dated 08.06.2022 in Writ Petition (M/S) No.2201 of 2021 and the order dated 19.07.2022, passed on modification application (MCC No.03 of 2022).

4. The writ petitioners had completed MBBS course from various government colleges on subsidized fees and they had filled a bond for rendering five years of service in hilly areas of the State, failing which, they were to refund Rs.30.00 Lakh to the State Government.

5. The case of the petitioners was that, after completing MBBS course, they have succeeded in getting admission in P.G. courses in different private medical colleges, except petitioner no.8, who got admission in a Government P.G. College. They filed the writ petition praying for the following reliefs:-

“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to adjust the period which the petitioners have served in pursuance to the bond before taking admission in the P.G. Courses from the total 3 year of compulsory service in hilly area.

ii) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

iii) To award the cost of the petitions in favor of the petitioners.

iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to evenly divide the bond money according to the time period of the bond years. 30 lakhs for five year or 6 lakhs per year for M.B.B.S. candidates and 15 lakhs for 3 years or 5 lakhs per year for PG (MD/ MS) candidates whichever is suited for the candidate.”

6. Thus, the petitioners wanted the period, during which they had served in pursuance of the bond before taking admission in Government College, to be adjusted in the bond period of three years, which they were required to render after doing P.G. course in terms of the prevalent government orders.

7. The writ Court disposed of the writ petition relying on the order in another writ petition bearing Writ Petition (M/S) No.1224 of 2014, “Dr. Lalit Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand & others”. Sub-paragraph (ii) of Paragraph 25 of the said judgment, in terms whereof the writ petition was disposed of, is extracted below:-

“25. (i)…

(ii) Petitioners, who had furnished surety bonds/undertakings pursuant to the Government Order dated 30.06.2006 for availing the benefit of the financial help have to serve State of Uttarakhand for a minimum period of five years either before joining the PG course or after completing the PG course. Period of service, if any, rendered before joining the PG course shall be adjusted in the total period of service of five years.”

8. It is noteworthy that under Government Order dated 23.07.2008, the bond period specified was five years after MBBS course and three years after Post Graduation. Since the petitioners had got admission in PG courses, therefore, after completion of the same, in terms of clause 7 of the Government Order dated 23.07.2008, they were to render three years of service, failing which, they had to compensate the Government in a sum of Rs.15.00 Lakh.

9. For the said reason, a modification application came to be filed in the writ petition and by order dated 19.07.2022, the Writ Court clarified that the bond period shall be read as three years instead of five years i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top