SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(UK) 68

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J., SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Paratech Rajesh Kumar Contractor JV – Petitioner
Versus 
State of Uttarakhand & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 169 of 2026
Decided On : 20-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Utsav Amagotra, Mr. Kanishk Manchanda, Mr. Aditya Pandita, Mr. Shobhit Joshi and Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel.
For the Respondents: Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel.

Writ of mandamus granted directing the state to consider the application for a stone crushing unit without bias from prior orders, emphasizing merit-based evaluations in administrative decisions.

Headnote:(A) Environmental Protection Act - Consideration for granting permissions - Writ of mandamus sought for the granting of ‘Consent to Establish’ and ‘Consent to Operate’ a stone crusher unit - Court directed respondents to evaluate the application on its merits considering previous judgments and existing circumstances. (Paras 1, 3-5)

(B) Administrative Procedure - The court noted the necessity for timely decisions by authorities in similar cases as demonstrated by previous orders, emphasizing that applications ought to be considered on their own merits. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought permission for a mobile stone crushing plant under an awarded contract, which was delayed due to prior restrictions pending environmental assessments and prior court orders referencing similar permissions granted.

Findings of Court:
The court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to decide on the application expeditiously without bias from this order.

Issues: The main issue was whether the respondents were obligated to consider the application given the context of prior orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that applications for permissions should be evaluated independently and on merit per existing administrative precedents.

Result: Writ petition disposed of; respondents directed to decide the application within four weeks.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks approval for stone crusher unit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. similar applications granted; no opposition to the writ. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. writ petition disposed directing consideration of application. (Para 7 , 8)
4. pending applications disposed. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no.1 to consider and decide the petitioner’s application No.934931, and subsequent representation dated 06.03.2026 for grant of ‘Consent to Establish’ and ‘Consent to Operate’ a temporary, captive mobile stone crusher plant/ unit at the proposed site Village Pifiyara/Pifyara, Patti Khattal, Tehsil Badkot, District Uttarkashi on its own merits and in light of the judgment and order dated 30.12.2025 in Writ Petition (M/B) No.281 of 2025 and order dated 25.02.2026 in Writ Petition (M/B) No.119 of 2026.

2. On 08.07.2025, petitioner has been awarded the contract for widening of 2 Lane from Existing Chainage Km 74.7000- Km 100.660 (Design Chainage Km 53.365 to Km 78.785) on NH 507 in the State under EPC mode. On 03.10.2025, internal letter No.4478 was issued by the office of Chief Engineer, National Highways, PWD, Uttarakhand regarding registration of the contract between the petitioner and respondent no.4.

3. For executing the work under the contract, the petitioner submitted an application for setting up a temporary captive mobile stone crushing plant at the site stated above. The application was kept on hold in view of the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board letter dated 27.05.2025. It was issued to give effect to an interim order dated 22.05.2025 in Writ Petition (M/B) No.281 of 2025, “Mahendra Singh & another vs. Union of India & others”, whereby this Court restrained the respondents from granting permission for setting up new stone crushing units till the exercise of identification of dedicated zones for crushing and dumping of stones/ RBM is complete.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the said writ petition itself, by order dated 30.12.2025, Coordinate Bench granted permission for consideration of application for setting up a temporary mobile stone crushing plant for purposes of meeting requirements of contract relating to construction of Jamrani Dam Multipurpose Project.

5. Similar permission has also been granted in favour of M/s Sarthi Construction and Infra Pvt. Ltd. & another Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others, vide order dated 25.02.2026.

6. Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board do not oppose the prayer made in the writ petition and very fairly accept that in identical facts and circumstances, this court had permitted consideration of the application on its own merit.

7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner for setting up temporary captive unit for stone crushing along with the subsequent representation dated 06th March, 2026 expeditiously and preferably within four weeks from the date of communication of the instant order.

8. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the application of the petitioner and the same shall be examined by the respondents without being influenced by any observation made in the instant order.

9. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top