IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, PANKAJ PUROHIT, JJ.
Dr. Suneet Naithani - Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 234 of 2019
Decided On : 12-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's prior contractual service claimed for cas benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. ugc 10.1 counts previous regular service for cas. (Para 3) |
| 3. contractual service lacks regular status for cas. (Para 4) |
| 4. ad-hoc service >1 year counts if conditions met. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 5. liberty to represent citing ugc regulations granted. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Petitioner was earlier appointed as Associate Professor on contract in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, Nainital on 22.07.2006, pursuant to which, he joined duties on 27.07.2006. Petitioner served in the Uttarakhand Academy of Administration as Associate Professor for nearly three years. While he was serving in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, he applied for the post of Assistant Professor in Doon University and upon being selected he was offered appointment by the competent authority in the said University on 07.07.2009 and he joined duties as Assistant Professor in the said University on 09.07.2009.
2. According to the petitioner, the services rendered by him as Associate Professor in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration are liable to be counted towards experience for getting the benefit under Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) introduced by the UGC Regulations, 2010. His claim was forwarded by Executive Council of the Doon University to the State Government for decision. State Government, however, rejected petitioner’s claim, vide order dated 17.02.2014 on the ground that since his employment was contractual in nature, therefore, services rendered in contractual capacity cannot be taken into account for grant of benefit under Career Advancement Scheme. The decision taken by the State Government has not been challenged in the writ petition, however, petitioner has sought the following reliefs in the writ petition:-
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to 4 to consider the case of the petitioner towards counting the services rendered by the petitioner at the Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, Nainital with the Doon University for the purpose of ACP and promotion, as per the UGC regulation, 2010.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to 4 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner for counting the services rendered by him at the Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, Nainital with the Doon University for the purpose of ACP and promotion, as per the UGC regulation, 2010.”
3. The relevant UGC Regulation is on record as Annexure-5 to the writ petition. Clause 10 of the UGC Regulations deals with counting of past services for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS. Clause 10.1 provides that previous regular service, whether national or international, as Assistant Professor, Associate Professor or Professor or equivalent in a University, College, National Laboratories etc., should be counted for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS.
4. Learned State Counsel submits that since previous regular service is a condition precedent for taking into account the earlier services rendered by a teacher before his appointment in a University and since petitioner was not having regular status while serving in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, therefore, his claim for benefit of UGC Regulations, 2010 was rightly rejected.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however relies upon clause (f) of para 10.1 of UGC Regulations, 2010, which reads as under:-
“(f). The previous appointment was not as guest lecturer for any duration, or an ad hoc or in a leave vacancy of less than one year duration. Ad hoc or temporary service of more than one year duration can be counted provided that:
(i) The period of service was of more than one year duration;
(ii) The incumbent was appointed on the recommendation of duly constituted Selection Committee; and
(iii) The incumbent was selected to the permanent post in continuation to the ad hoc or
Ad hoc/temporary service >1 year counts for CAS under UGC Regulations Clause 10.1(f) if by Selection Committee and continued to permanent post without break; court directs reconsideration.
Promotion – Date of initial appointment is to be counted as regular service for the purpose of grant of benefits in accordance with Career Advancement Scheme (“CAS”) under UGC Regulations.
Past service in temporary roles can be counted for promotion under Career Advancement Scheme, aligning with UGC regulations; denial of such benefits violates legal rights.
Previous regular service in academic positions must be considered for promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme, and universities cannot unjustly require specific documents from prior employment.
Past services in private institutions must be counted for Career Advancement Scheme eligibility, and subsequent Executive Councils cannot revoke earlier decisions without lawful basis.
The court upheld the University's decision not to count prior service as Academic Consultants for promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme, affirming compliance with UGC regulations.
Past services of a professor can be counted for promotion under UGC regulations, regardless of whether the previous pay scale was higher than UGC standards.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the 2010 Regulations provide for the counting of previous regular service for the purposes of grant of benefits under CAS, without making a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.