SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(UK) 159

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, PANKAJ PUROHIT, JJ.
Dr. Suneet Naithani - Petitioner 
Versus 
State of Uttarakhand & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 234 of 2019
Decided On : 12-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel
For the Respondents: Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Mr. Shubhang Dobhal.

Ad hoc/temporary service >1 year counts for CAS under UGC Regulations Clause 10.1(f) if by Selection Committee and continued to permanent post without break; court directs reconsideration.

Headnote:(A) UGC Regulations, 2010 - Clause 10.1 - Career Advancement Scheme - Counting of past services for direct recruitment and promotion - Previous regular service counted; ad hoc or temporary service of more than one year duration countable provided: (i) period > one year; (ii) appointed on recommendation of duly constituted Selection Committee; (iii) selected to permanent post in continuation without break. Contractual service as Associate Professor for nearly three years rejected solely on contractual nature - Claim forwarded by University, rejected by State Government - Court observes reliance on Clause (f) para 10.1 overlooked. (Paras 3-7)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner appointed as Associate Professor on contract, joined duties, served nearly three years. Applied and selected as Assistant Professor in University, joined duties. Services rendered in prior contractual capacity claimed countable for Career Advancement Scheme benefits per UGC Regulations, 2010. University forwarded claim; State Government rejected as contractual, order not challenged. Writ seeks mandamus to consider prior service for ACP and promotion per UGC Regulations.

Findings of Court:
Writ petition disposed with liberty to make representation to State Government in light of applicable UGC Regulations including Clause (f) para 10.1 within two weeks; decision thereon by Secretary, Higher Education as per law within four months.

Issues: Whether nearly three years contractual service qualifies as countable past service under Clause 10.1(f) UGC Regulations for Career Advancement Scheme benefits; propriety of rejection solely on contractual nature without considering Clause (f) conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: Ad hoc or temporary service exceeding one year duration can be counted for promotion under CAS if all three conditions in Clause 10.1(f) satisfied; State Government overlooked this aspect despite University recommendations.

Result: Writ petition disposed with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's prior contractual service claimed for cas benefits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. ugc 10.1 counts previous regular service for cas. (Para 3)
3. contractual service lacks regular status for cas. (Para 4)
4. ad-hoc service >1 year counts if conditions met. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. liberty to represent citing ugc regulations granted. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Petitioner was earlier appointed as Associate Professor on contract in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, Nainital on 22.07.2006, pursuant to which, he joined duties on 27.07.2006. Petitioner served in the Uttarakhand Academy of Administration as Associate Professor for nearly three years. While he was serving in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, he applied for the post of Assistant Professor in Doon University and upon being selected he was offered appointment by the competent authority in the said University on 07.07.2009 and he joined duties as Assistant Professor in the said University on 09.07.2009.

2. According to the petitioner, the services rendered by him as Associate Professor in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration are liable to be counted towards experience for getting the benefit under Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) introduced by the UGC Regulations, 2010. His claim was forwarded by Executive Council of the Doon University to the State Government for decision. State Government, however, rejected petitioner’s claim, vide order dated 17.02.2014 on the ground that since his employment was contractual in nature, therefore, services rendered in contractual capacity cannot be taken into account for grant of benefit under Career Advancement Scheme. The decision taken by the State Government has not been challenged in the writ petition, however, petitioner has sought the following reliefs in the writ petition:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to 4 to consider the case of the petitioner towards counting the services rendered by the petitioner at the Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, Nainital with the Doon University for the purpose of ACP and promotion, as per the UGC regulation, 2010.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to 4 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner for counting the services rendered by him at the Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, Nainital with the Doon University for the purpose of ACP and promotion, as per the UGC regulation, 2010.”

3. The relevant UGC Regulation is on record as Annexure-5 to the writ petition. Clause 10 of the UGC Regulations deals with counting of past services for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS. Clause 10.1 provides that previous regular service, whether national or international, as Assistant Professor, Associate Professor or Professor or equivalent in a University, College, National Laboratories etc., should be counted for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS.

4. Learned State Counsel submits that since previous regular service is a condition precedent for taking into account the earlier services rendered by a teacher before his appointment in a University and since petitioner was not having regular status while serving in Uttarakhand Academy of Administration, therefore, his claim for benefit of UGC Regulations, 2010 was rightly rejected.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however relies upon clause (f) of para 10.1 of UGC Regulations, 2010, which reads as under:-

“(f). The previous appointment was not as guest lecturer for any duration, or an ad hoc or in a leave vacancy of less than one year duration. Ad hoc or temporary service of more than one year duration can be counted provided that:

(i) The period of service was of more than one year duration;

(ii) The incumbent was appointed on the recommendation of duly constituted Selection Committee; and

(iii) The incumbent was selected to the permanent post in continuation to the ad hoc or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top