SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 332

K.L.SHRIVASTAVA
RAVINDRA – Appellant
Versus
V. K. PANWAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHARGVAN

K. L. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dt. 6-2-1984 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain in Criminal Revision No. 114 of 1983 whereby allowing the revision filed by the non-applicant it has been held that cognizance of the offence under S. 323 of the I. P. C. against the non-applicant cannot be taken without prior sanction as required under S. 197 (1) of the Cr. P. C. 1973 (for short 'the Code' ).

( 2 ) CIRCUMSTANCES giving rise to the revision petition are these. During the 'simhashtha' of 1980 at Ujjain the non-applicant who belongs to Indian Police Service (I. P. S.) was Addl. Superintendent of Police, Ujjain. He was officer-in-charge of the Simhashtha fair. Under the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1969 a member of I. P. S. is removable from service with the sanction of the Central Govt.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, when on 26-4-80 at about 10. 30 p. m. he was returning on his motor cycle through the fair area on way to his residence, the non-applicant stopped him and questioned him as to why he had come on the prohibited route. The petitioner had a pass issued by the Superintendent of Police. He sho

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top