SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 738

S.P.KHARE
CHETAK CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED, INDORE – Appellant
Versus
OM PRAKASH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
F.DIVETRE, Kishore Shrivastava, RAJESH PANCHOLI, VIVEK TANKHA

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Order 43, Rule 1 (r), CPC by the plaintiff-company against the order by which its application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, CPC for temporary injunction for restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff-company on the property in dispute has been rejected.

( 2 ) THIS appeal has been transferred by the Supreme Court by order dated 20-4-1998 in Civil Appeal No. 2140 of 1998 from Indore to Jabalpur and it has been assigned to this Bench by Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

( 3 ) THE facts which are not in dispute are that the defendant Nos. 1 to 4 with thirty other persons executed the agreement dated 13-9-1986 in favour of the plaintiff-company. By this agreement they covenanted to sell the property known as House Nos. 8 and 8-A (8/1 and 8/2) situated at Mahatma Gandhi Road, Indore to the plaintiff-company. This property consisted of 1,00,000 sq ft. of land with two houses constructed thereon. One house was on 1500 Sq. ft. in possession of defendant No. 1 Om Prakash Khandelwal and the other house was on 3500 sq. ft. in possession of defendant No. 3 Vijay Kumar Khandelwal. They are real brothers. They have been


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top