DIPAK MISRA, R.K.GUPTA
ASHOK KUMAR MALPANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
DIPAK MISRA, J.
( 1 ) IN this batch of writ petition, the centroidal issue that has been sought to be assiduously pyramided with immense gloss is that the amendments brought into force in the M. P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (in short 'the 1956 Act')and the M. P. Municipalities Act, 1961 by the M. P. Nagar Palika Vidhi (Sanshodhan)Adhiniyam, 2007 as a consequence of which the reservation in favour of women has increased from 33% to 50%. in Municipal Corporations and Municipalities in the State of m. P. is unsustainable being violative of Arts. 14 and 15 ( 1) of the Constitution and as a sequitur thereof, Rule 3 of the Madhya Pradesh municipalities (Reservation of Wards for scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other backward Classes and Women) Rules, 1994 (for brevity 'the 1994 Rules') as amended vide notification dated 3-9-2007 is also unconstitutional. The aforesaid structure of the edifice has led to the prayer declaring the statutory provisions as ultra vires and quashment of the consequent notifications and orders. In spite of various range of asseverations of facts in the writ petitions, the learned counsel for the petitioners restricted the relief to the constitut
REFERRED TO : Satish v. State of M. P.
Anuj Garg and another v. Hotel Association of India and others
Than Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of W. B. and another v. EITA India Ltd.
M. N. Abdul Rawoof v. Pichamutha and others
Preeti Shrivastava v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh v. Faculty Association
Union of India v. R.K.Prabhakaran
Madhu Kishwar v. State of Bihar
Krishna Kumar Mishra v. State of Bihar
S.Sathyapriya v. State of A.P.
Anil Kumar Gupta v. State of U. P.
R.C. Poudyal v. Union of India and others
Thota Sesharanthamma v. Thota Manikyamma
Deepak Sibal v. Punjab University
Chakradhar Paswan v. State of Bihar
Amarnath Datt v. State of Bihar
Sapru v. State of J. and K. and others
State of J.andK. v. Triloki Nath Khosa
Western U. P. Electric Power and Supply Co. Ltd. v. State of U. P.
Sakal Paper (P) Ltd. v. The Union of India
pattatraya Motiram v. State of Bombay
Yusuf Abdul Aziz v. State of Bombay
Vijay Lakshmi v. Punjab University
Ashok Kumar Tripathi v. Union of India
Govt, of A.P. v. P.B.Vijay Kumar
Lachhman Dass v. State of Punjab
DCM Financial Services Limited v. J. N. Sareen and another
M. Nagraj and others v. Union of India and others
Rajesh Kumar Gupta V. State of U. P.
Daya Ram and another v. State of M.P. and others
Rajeev Chaudhary v. State (NCT) of Delhi
Kasambhai F. Ghanchi v. Chandubhai D.Rajpur and others, etc.
State of Andhra Pradesh and others v. Mc Dowell and Co. and others
Anugrah Narain Singh v. State of U.P.
Swati Gupta (Ms) v. State of U. P.
Gauri Shankar v. Union of India
Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika Shahjahanpur
St. Stephens College v. University of Delhi
Janardhan Paswan v. State of Bihar
Menaka Gandhi v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.