SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 702

RAJENDRA MENON
Anil Padegaonkar – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petroleum Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.D.Jain, S.N.SETH, Vivek Jain,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE petitioner was working as Aviation Officer in Management Cadre in

Job Group a and was posted at Gwalior Aviation Service Station, in the year 1990 when due to certain misconduct alleged to have been committed by him, a charge-sheet dated 31-12-1993 (Annexure P-12) was issued to him. The charges levelled against the petitioner related to his acting in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the Corporation and neglect of work. The petitioner was asked to submit his reply to the aforesaid charge-sheet within ten days, vide Annexure P-13, dated 6-1-94, the Dy. General Manager, Aviation appointed Enquiry Officer to conduct an enquiry into the allegations levelled in the charge-sheet.

( 2. ) IT is the case of the petitioner that he had asked for certain documents in order to enable him to submit the written statement but without giving him due opportunity, the enquiry was proceeded with. In the meanwhile, while the enquiry into the aforesaid charge-sheet was pending and after the said enquiry was conducted on 25-8-94, just thereafter on 14-9-94 he was placed under suspension vide Annexure P-19 and on 27-9-94 another charge-sheet was issued to him vide Annexure P-20 and


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top