SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 60

A.G.QURESHI, P.D.MULYE
ANUPAMA – Appellant
Versus
LAXMANRAO SAMBHAJIRAO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Chitale, B.K.SAMDANI, N.K.Santhi, S.D.Sanghi,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS judgment shall also govern the disposal of M. A. No. 33 of 1982 The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Smt. Anupama and others as both these appeals are directed against the same award dated 12th October, 1981 given by the Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dhar in Claim Case No. 3 of 1980.

( 2. ) M. A. No. 25 of 1982 has been filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation, whereas M. A. No. 33 of 1982 has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging their liability for the entire amount of compensation as awarded by the tribunal.

( 3. ) THE facts giving rise to these appeals, which are no longer in dispute and as found proved, may be stated, in brief, thus : Bus number CPF 9187 is owned by the indian Tourism Development Corporation, of which on the relevant day of the accident, which took place on 24-6-1979, Laxman Rao was the driver in the employment of the Indian Tourism Development Corporation. The said bus was insured with the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Limited.

( 4. ) THE claimant-appellants are the legal representatives of deceased kishorechand Vyas, who at the time of the accident was employed as a Depot superintendent by


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top