SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 284

K.L.SHRIVASTAVA
Bhaskar Bhai S/O. Apa Bhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER

K.L. Shrivastava, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.11.1989 passed by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Indore in Cr. Case No. 6 of 1990 whereby he has under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short 'the Code') ordered issue of process against the petitioner on the complaint filed by the Factory Inspector, Indore.

2. Circumstances giving rise to the revision petition are these: The petitioner is an occupier within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Factories Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'). According to the complaint he contravened the provisions of Section 48 of the said Act and Rule 87 of the Madhya Pradesh Factories Rules, 1962 (for short 'the Rules'). He is, therefore, punishable under Section 92 of the Factories Act.

3. The learned Addi. Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence and passed the impugned order.

4. It is not in controversy that the impugned order is revisable. In this connection reference may usefully be made to the decisione in L.N. Jadhav's case, 1983 JLJ S.N. 69 and A.K.Su-bbiah's case,1987 CAR 288-1987 SCC 557. The last mentioned decision further points out, that the revisional Court has





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top