SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 260

2012(3) JLJ 137
S.K. Gangele and Brij Kishore Dube, JJ.
Manish Gupta v. State of M.P.
Writ Petition No.652 of 2012 (PIL) (Gwalior); Decided on 30.4.2012.

Advocates:
D.P. Singh for petitioner;
M.P.S. Raghuvanshi, Additional Advocate General and Raghvendra Dixit, Government Advocate for respondents/State;
N.K. Gupta and Sanjeev Jain for respondents No.12 and 13.

Headnote:(1) Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Vikasit Bhoomiyon, Grihon, Bhavanon Tatha Anya Sanrachanaon Ka Vyayan Niyam, 1975 (M.P.) -- R.23 -- tenders for allotment of 374.91 acres of land invited by SADA -- tender of highest bidder accepted -- 25% premium amount not deposited within 30 days from date of acceptance of bid -- entire premium amount also not deposited -- lease of 71.77 acres of land executed in favour of highest bidder -- possession of 374.91 acres of land handed over to bidder -- while no lease-deed of 374.91 acres of land not executed -- such action of authority of Sada -- is arbitrary, illegal and mala fide -- allotment of rest of land except 71.77 acres of land cancelled.

       Held : The respondent No.13 did not deposit 25% premium amount within a period of 30 days from the date of issuance of reservation-cum-acceptance letter and it had taken more than two years in depositing 25% premium amount. The respondent-Company also did not deposit the entire premium amount in accordance with the initial letter of award of contract. Subsequently, another letter was issued, however, the Company also did not comply the terms and conditions of the letter. A lease-deed of 71.77 acres of land has been executed in favour of the Company, however, as per the advertisement, it was necessary to deposit all the amount and thereafter, a lease-deed of total area of land 374.91 acres can be executed. The Company was also given possession of the entire land, even though it did not deposit the total amount, neither any lease-deed of 374.91 acres was executed in favour of the Company. Hence, the SADA has changed the terms and conditions of the contract completely. It is in favour of the Company. The Company is also permitted to receive an amount of Rs.10.85 lacs from the customers as advance bookings, however, as per initial advertisement, the successful bidder could only start construction after depositing all the amount of contract. Hence, the action of the authority is arbitrary, illegal and mala fide and it has been done to give benefit to respondent No.13-Company.

        [Para 16

       If the allotment of entire land of 374.91 acres be cancelled, then the customers who have paid the amount would suffer adversely and their hard earned money may be lost. In this view of the matter, in our opinion, it would not be just and proper to cancel the lease-deed of 71.77 acres of land, which has already been executed in favour of the respondent No.13-Company, however, allotment of rest of the land i.e. 303.14 acres (374.91 acres - 71.77 acres) in favour of respondent No.13-Company is illegal, hence, it is hereby cancelled. (1995)1 SCC 478, (2010)6 SCC 303 and (2012)3 SCC 1 discussed. (2011)5 SCC 484, (2004)3 SCC 349, (2010)12 SCC 305, (2010)3 SCC 402 and 2011(I) MPWN 120 referred to.

       (2) Constitution of India -- Art.226 -- writ petition as PIL -- maintainability of -- land allotted by Sada -- allotment of land contrary to terms and conditions of contract -- petitioner is a peace loving person -- alleged allegation against petitioner not proved -- writ petition against such allotment is maintainable as PIL. (2010)3 SCC 402 followed. [Para 17

       ¼1½ uxj rFkk xzke fuos‘k fodflr Hkwfe;ksa] x`gksa] Hkouksa rFkk vU; lajpukvksa dk O;;u fu;e] 1975 ¼e-iz-½ && fu-23 && lkMk }kjk 374-91 ,dM+ Hkwfe ds vkcaVu ds fy, fufonk,a vkeaf=r && lcls Å¡ph cksyh yxkus okys dh fufonk Lohd`r && cksyh Lohdkj djus dh rkjh[k ls 30 fnol ds Hkhrj izhfe;e jde dk 25 izfr‘kr tek ugha fd;k && iw.kZ izhfe;e jde Hkh tek ugha dh xbZ && lcls Å¡ph cksyh yxkus okys ds i{k esa 71-77 ,dM+ Hkwfe dk iV~Vk&foys[k fu"ikfnr && cksyh yxkus okys dks 374-91 ,dM+ Hkwfe dk dCtk lkSaik x;k && tcfd 374-91 ,dM+ Hkwfe dk iV~Vk&foys[k fu"ikfnr ugha && lkMk izkf/kdkjh dh ,slh dkjZokbZ && euekuh] voS/k rFkk vln~HkkoiwoZd gS && 71-77 ,dM+ Hkwfe NksM+dj ‘ks"k Hkwfe dk vkcaVu jn~n fd;k x;kA

       vfHkfu/kkZfjr % izR;FkhZ Ø-13 us vkj{k.k≶&Lohd`fr i= tkjh djus dh rkjh[k ls 30 fnol ds Hkhrj izhfe;e jde dk 25 izfr‘kr tek ugha fd;k rFkk ;g 25 izfr‘kr izhfe;e jde tek djus esa 2 o"kZ ls vf/kd dk le; fy;k x;k gSA izR;FkhZ daiuh us lafonk iznku djus ds izkjafHkd i= ds vuqlkj iw.kZ izhfe;e jde Hkh tek ugha dh gSA rRi‘pkr~] ,d vkSj i= tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk] fQj Hkh] daiuh us i= ds fuca/ku vkSj ‘krksZa dk ikyu ugha fd;kA daiuh ds i{k esa 71-77 ,dM+ Hkwfe dk iV~Vk&foys[k fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k gS] rFkkfi] foKkiu ds vuqlkj] iw.kZ jde tek djuk vko‘;d Fkk rFkk rRi‘pkr~] Hkwfe ds dqy {ks=Qy 374-91 ,dM+ dk iV~Vk&foys[k fu"ikfnr fd;k tk ldrk FkkA daiuh dks dCtk Hkh iw.kZ Hkwfe dk fn;k x;k Fkk] ;|fi blus iw.kZ jde tek ugha dh Fkh] u gh daiuh ds i{k esa 374-91 ,dM+ Hkwfe dk dksbZ iV~Vk&foys[k fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k FkkA vr% lkMk us lafonk ds fuca/kuksa rFkk ‘krksZa dks iw.kZr;k ifjofrZr fd;k gSA ;g daiuh ds i{k esa gSA daiuh dks xzkgdksa ls vfxze cqfdax dj :-10 yk[k izkIr djuk Hkh vuqKkr fd;k gS] rFkkfi] izkjafHkd foKkiu ds vuqlkj] lQy cksyh yxkus okyk dsoy lafonk dh iw.kZ jde tek djus ds i‘pkr~ gh fuekZ.k dk;Z izkjaHk dj ldrk gSA vr%] izkf/kdkjh dh dkjZokbZ euekuh] voS/k vkSj vln~HkkoiwoZd gS rFkk ;g izR;FkhZ Ø-13&daiuh dks Qk;nk nsus ds fy, dh xbZ gSA

       ;fn dqy Hkwfe 374-91 ,dM+ dk vkcaVu jn~n fd;k tkrk gS] rc xzkgd tks jde dk Hkqxrku dj pqds gSa mUgsa izfrdwy :i ls uqdlku mBkuk gksxk rFkk mudk dfBu mikftZr /ku yqIr gks ldrk gSA ekeys ds bl n`f"Vdks.k ls] gekjh jk; esa] 71-77 ,dM+ Hkwfe dk iV~Vk tks izR;FkhZ Ø-13&daiuh ds i{k esa igys ls gh fu"ikfnr gS mls jn~n djuk U;k;laxr rFkk mfpr ugha gksxk] fQj Hkh] ‘ks"k Hkwfe dk vkcaVu vFkkZr~ 303-14 ,dM+ ¼374-91 ,dM+ & 71-77½ ,dM+ izR;FkhZ Ø-13&daiuh ds i{k esa voS/k gS] blfy,] ;g ,rn~}kjk jn~n fd;k tkrk gSA ¼1995½1 ,l lh lh 478] ¼2010½6 ,l lh lh 303 rFkk ¼2012½3 ,l lh lh 1 foosfprA ¼2011½5 ,l lh lh 484] ¼2004½3 ,l lh lh 349] ¼2010½12 ,l lh lh 305] ¼2010½3 ,l lh lh 402 rFkk 2011¼1½ e-iz- ohDyh uksV~~l 120 fufnZ"VA

       ¼2½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku && vuq-226 && yksdfgr eqdnesckth ds :i esa fjV ;kfpdk && dk pykus ;ksX; gksuk && Hkwfe dk vkcaVu lafonk ds fuca/kuksa rFkk ‘krksZa ds izfrdwy && ;kfpdkdrkZ ‘kkafrfiz; O;fDr && ;kph ds fo:) dfFkr vkjksi lkfcr ugha && ,sls vkcaVu ds fo:) yksdfgr eqdnesckth ds :i esa fjV ;kfpdk pykus ;ksX; gSA ¼2010½3 ,l lh lh 402 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 17

ORDER

Gangele, J. -- 1. The petitioner has filed this Public Interest Litigation in regard to allotment of a land having area 374.91 acres situate at A-4, Residential Sector, Gwalior in favour of respondent No.13.

2. The petitioner is a co-auditor of a Hindi weekly newspapers “Mradang”. He pleaded that the land mentioned above has been allotted in favour of respondent No.13 on extraneous consideration in an arbitrary manner and a loss of Rs.100/- crores has been caused to the Government and to Special Area Development Authority in the allotment of land contrary to the terms and conditions of the tender notice.

3. The respondent No.7-Special Area Development Authority (Counter Magnet), Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as ‘the SADA’) invited bids for residential plots on pre-qualification basis vide notification dated 23.11.2007. The notification was published in various newspapers and a wide publicity had been given to the notification. The area of the land is 374.91 acres, reserved price was fixed at Rs.40,30,54,812/- and earnest money was Rs.88.62 lacs. As per the terms and conditions of the tender, successful bidder would have to pay 25% of the total premium of the plot within 30 days from the date of issuance of reservation-cum-acceptance letter and rest 75% amount could be paid in lumpsum in six half yearly instalments with interest.The respondent No.13 along with other bidders submitted their bids in pursuance to the aforesaid advertisement. The bid of respondent No.13 who offered Rs.58,00,01,001/- was accepted being highest and the aforesaid company was found eligible for allotment of the land. Consequently, a letter was issued in favour of M/s. Sunil Mantri Reality Limited in regard to allotment of land having area 374.91 acres in terms of the notification. The respondent No.13 was directed to pay the amount in the following instalments with interest on particular dates :

Instalment Balance Yearly Interest @ 9% Total payable Due date premium instalment amount

Second 43,50,00,750 10,87,50,188 3,91,50,068 14,79,00,256 31.3.2009

Third 32,62,50,560 10,87,50,188 2,93,62,551 13,81,12,739 31.3.2010

Fourth 21,75,00,374 10,87,50,188 1,95,75,034 12,83,25,222 31.3.2011

Fifth 10,87,50,186 10,87,50,188 97,87,517 11,85,37,703 31.3.2012

43,50,00,750 9,78,75,170 53,28,75,920

4. The respondent No.13 did not deposit the 25% premium amount which was required to be deposited within a period of 30 days from the date of issuance of reservation-cum-acceptance letter. The respondent-Company deposited Rupees One crore on 25.3.2008 vide cheque No.132277 and thereafter on 19.5.2008, the respondent-Company had deposited three cheques of Rs.13.50 crores of different dates. As per the return filed by the SADA, the respondent-Company had deposited a total premium amount of Rs.25% 14,50,00,250/- upto 21.9.2010. Thereafter, a fresh allotment order was issued on 12.10.2010 in favour of respondent-Company and he was directed to pay rest of the amount in three instalments in following manner :

Instalment Due Date Balance Amount of Interest Total amount

Premium Instalment

First 25.1.2011 43,50,00,751 14,50,00,250 11,74,50,203 2,62,45,045

Second 25.1.2012 29,00,00,501 14,50,00,250 2,61,00,045 17,11,002

Third 25.1.2013 14,50,00,250 14,50,00,250 1,30,50,023 15,80,502

58,00,01,001 15,66,00,270 43,66,012

5. The SADA also executed a lease-deed in favour of respondent No.13-Sunil Mantri Reality Limited of total area of 71.77 acres of land. The total premium amount of the land has been mentioned as Rs.11,10,31,106/ in the lease-deed dated 21.6.2011. The lease rent of the land has been fixed as Rs.92,820/- per year. The possession of the entire land i.e. 374.91 acres had also been handed over to respondent No.13 on 24.2.2010










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top