SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 963

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Gyasi Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Gyanchandra Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shailendra Samaiya, R. K. Samaiya , Pranay Verma, Ravish Agrawal, Senior

JUDGMENT : 

This revision is directed by the applicant/tenant under section 23-E of Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") being aggrieved by the order dated 23-1-2006 passed in Case No. RCA 4/A-90/2003-2004 by the Rent Controlling Authority, Tikamgarh allowing the application of the respondent filed under section 23-A(b) of the Act for eviction of the applicant from the shop described in such application situated in House No. 12 of Ward No. 10, at Tikamgarh.

2. The facts giving rise to this revision in short are that the respondent herein filed aforesaid application before the Rent Controlling Authority, Tikamgarh under section 23-A(b) of the Act contending that the applicant herein being his tenant is in occupation of one shop described in the application situated at Tikamgarh @ Rs. 500/- pm for non-residential purpose. As per further averments the respondent being retired government servant from the post of teacher is in bona fide genuine need of such shop to start his business with his sons namely Arvind and Sanjay, for which they do not possess any other suitable accommodation of their own in the township of Tikamgarh. The disputed shop is more suit






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top