U.C.MAHESHWARI
Gyasi Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Gyanchandra Jain – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This revision is directed by the applicant/tenant under section 23-E of Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") being aggrieved by the order dated 23-1-2006 passed in Case No. RCA 4/A-90/2003-2004 by the Rent Controlling Authority, Tikamgarh allowing the application of the respondent filed under section 23-A(b) of the Act for eviction of the applicant from the shop described in such application situated in House No. 12 of Ward No. 10, at Tikamgarh.2. The facts giving rise to this revision in short are that the respondent herein filed aforesaid application before the Rent Controlling Authority, Tikamgarh under section 23-A(b) of the Act contending that the applicant herein being his tenant is in occupation of one shop described in the application situated at Tikamgarh @ Rs. 500/- pm for non-residential purpose. As per further averments the respondent being retired government servant from the post of teacher is in bona fide genuine need of such shop to start his business with his sons namely Arvind and Sanjay, for which they do not possess any other suitable accommodation of their own in the township of Tikamgarh. The disputed shop is more suit
Kunju Lal Yadu Vs. Parashram Sharma, 2000(2) MPLJ (FB) 514 : 2000(2) JLJ 105 (Paras 7
Bhagwat Dutt Rishi Vs. Ram Kumar, (1990) 1 SCC 324 (Paras 12, 13
Mrs. Winifred Ross Vs. Mrs. Ivy Fonseca, (1984) 1 SCC 288 (Paras 13
Ravinder Singh Vs. Janmeja Singh
Hasmat Rai and others Vs. Raghunath Prasad, 1981 MPLJ (SC) 610 : 1981(3) SCC 103 (Paras 21, 24, 25
Banarsi Devi Jain Vs. M. P. Transport Company and another
Duggii Veer a Venkata Gopala Satyanarayana Vs. Sakala Veera Raghavaiah
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.