Back
SUJOY PAUL
Arvind Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Sujoy Paul, J.
This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution takes exception to the order dated 4.3.2006 Annexure P/14 and contains a prayer to declare the scheme as having been lapsed and abandoned in respect of Phase No.II. The petitioners prayed for a declaration that land of petitioners be treated as released from vesting. The challenge is also made to the resolution No.2 of Municipal Council dated 5.7.2006 Annexure P/20 and consequent advertisement of plots by Annexure P/21. A writ of mandamus is prayed for against Municipal Council, Itarsi for according permission to construct Jain Temple. The petitioners have prayed for a writ of prohibition for restraining the Municipal Council from taking over possession of petitioners' land and using the same for any other purpose whatsoever. Lastly, the challenge is made to the appellate order dated 25.11.2006 whereby the Statutory Appellate Committee has rejected the appeal of the petitioners.
2. Briefly stated, the relevant facts are that the petitioners were owners of certain land in Itarsi. The erstwhile Itarsi Town Improvement Trust (for short 'Trust") was constituted under the M.P. Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
