SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 880

HEMANT GUPTA, H.P.SINGH, RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Pankaj Kumar Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Gupta, C.J.--1. The present Writ Petition No.7798/2017 was earlier referred to Larger Bench vide order dated 16.8.2017 whereby a Division Bench of this Court prima facie found that the view taken by the Full Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 4547/2016 (M/s Phaloudi Constructions and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh) 2016 (2) RN 54 (FB) and other connected matters decided on 10.5.2016 requires reconsideration. Thus, following two questions were referred for consideration to the Larger Bench :

(i) Whether the purchase of minor minerals from open market in terms of 3rd proviso to rule 68(1) excludes the obtaining of “No Mining Dues” certificate from Mining Department as the open market may include illegally extracted minor minerals as well?

(ii) Whether the judgment in Phaloudi Constructions and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. lays down good law, in view of the fact that the amendment carried out in rules on 23rd March, 2013 and later on 2.7.2013 was not brought to the notice of the Bench, when the rule 68(1) was substituted?

2. Later, a Full Bench of three Judges hearing the petition found that the second question does not arise for consideration, but, fin




























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top