HEMANT GUPTA, H. P. SINGH, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Bhagwanti Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of MP – Respondent
Hemant Gupta, CJ.
A Division Bench of this Court on 27.3.2018 expressed its reservation with another Division Bench judgment of this Court passed on 6.4.2017 in bunch of appeals with main appeal bearing Writ Appeal No. 91/2017 (Narmada Valley Development Authority and others Vs. Shashikant Patel) [Indore Bench], and the matter was referred to the Larger Bench on the following questions:-
“(1) Whether the State Act deals with acquisition of land or only deals with grant of compensation for use of surface of land?
(2) Whether the Madhya Pradesh Bhumigat Pipeline, Cable Evam Duct (Bhumi Ke Upyokta Ke Adhikaran Ka Arjan) Adhiniyam, 2013 is repugnant to the Central Act for the reason that the same does not find mention in Schedule-IV of the Central Act, therefore, the State Act will not have any force of law?”
2. At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that in appeal before the Supreme Court being Diary No.22153/2017 directed against an order passed by this Court in Narmada Valley Development Authority and others Vs. Balu, (for short ‘NVDA’), the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed an order of giving liberty to the appellant to file a review application in view of the o
State of Kerala and others Vs. Mar Appraem Kuri Company Limited and another
A.S. Krishna and others v. State of Madras
Amalgamated Electricity Co. (Belgaum) Ltd. versus Municipal Committee, Ajmer
Central Bank of India vs. State of Kerala and Ors.
H.D. Vora v. State of Maharashtra
Indu Bhusan Bose versus Rama Sundari Devi & Anr.
Innoventive Industries Limited Vs. ICICI Bank and Another
Laljibhai Kadvabhai Savaliya and others Vs. State of Gujarat and others
M. Karunanidhi Vs. Union of India
M/s Girnar Traders Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Rustom Gavasjee Cooper Vs. Union of India
Security Association of India and Another Vs. Union of India and others
State Bank of India Vs. Santosh Gupta and another
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. K. Purushottam Reddy & Ors.
State of Bombay v. Narottamdas Jethabhai
State of Gujarat vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat & Ors.
State of MP vs. Rakesh Kohli & Anr.
UCO Bank and Another Vs. Dipak Debbarma and others
Welfare Association, ARP, Maharashtra & Anr vs. Ranjit P. Gohil & Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.