VIJAY KUMA SHUKLA
RAJENDRA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
HITENDRA KUMAR JAIN – Respondent
VIJAY KUMA SHUKLA, J.
1. This second appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by defendant/appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 27/07/2016 passed in civil appeal No. 54-A/2014 by the Additional Judge to the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Harda arising out of the judgment and decree dated 29/04/2014 passed in civil suit No. 18- A/2013 by IInd Additional Judge to the Court of First Civil Judge Class-II, Harda whereby the decree for eviction, possession and arrears of rent has been passed against the appellant. The said judgment and decree has been affirmed by the appellate court by the impugned judgment and decree.
2. The facts, necessary for adjudication of the present appeal are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a civil suit for eviction, arrears of rent and damages against the defendant on the ground that he is the owner of the suit shop. He is presently doing business in the rented premises belonging to his uncle Yatindra Kumar. It is pleaded that the shop in his occupation is not suitable for the business besides that there is no other his shop and further the rented present room is required by his aunty for runn
Bhupinder Singh Bawa Vs. Asha Devi
Dudhnath Pandey Vs. Suresh Chandra Bhattasali
Hasmat Rai Vs. Raghunath Prasad
Hero Vinoth minor Vs. Seshammal
Kamladevi Budhia Vs. Hem Prabha Ganguli
Narendra Gole Vs. Ram Krishna Sharma
Naresh Chandra Vs. Vinod Kumar
Prem Narayan Barchhiha Vs. Hakimuddin Saifi
Ragavendra Kumar Vs. Firm Prem Machinery and Company
Ram Vishal Vs. Dwarka Prasad Jaiswal
Ramanuja Naidu Vs. V. Kanniah Naidu
Sheela Vs. Firm Prahlad Rai Prem Prakash
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.