SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ARUN MISHRA
R. P. SHRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
SHEELA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Aradhe, for the Appellant; R.P. Agrawal with Praveen Dave, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Arun Mishra, J.

The plaintiff has called in question judgment and decree dated 10-5-2001 passed by Second Addl. District Judge, Bhopal in Regular Civil Suit No. 12-A/2000.

The plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for possession and for mesne profit with respect to the ancestral suit house situated at Marwadi Road, Bhopal. The property was owned by late Kunj Manohar Lal and Leeladhar. Their names were recorded as owner till 1923. Kunj Manohar Lal died issueless leaving behind Leeladhar as his only surviving legal representative. Leeladhar had three sons, namely Roshan Lal, Udaybhan and Bhanu Prakash. Bhanu Prakash died issueless sometime in the year 1939. Roshan Lal died in 1941 and Udaybhan also died in the year 1980. The share of Bhanu Prakash devolved upon Roshan Lal and Udaybhan and after their death property devolved on the plaintiffs the sons of Udaybhan and Roshan Lal. The plaintiffs averred that after death of Leeladhar, Roshan Lal and Udaybhan performed marriage of defendant No. 1 Smt. Sheelwati with Master Bhairo Prasad, who was a worker of Hindu Mahasabha, at the relevant time Nawab Hamidullah Khan was the Ruler of Bhopal, as such erstwhile Ruler was not happy due to ac

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top