ARUN MISHRA
ADARSH NAGAR GRIH NIRMAN SAHKARI SANSTHAN MARYADIT, BHOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
Arun Mishra, J.
Petitioner Housing Co-operative Society is challenging the acquisition of petitioner's land for the purpose of 'plantation of trees', acquired for the requirement of Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research Centre (here in after referred to as BMHRC) which is a hospital established mainly for the purpose of treatment of gas tragedy victims which took place due to release of gas from Union Carbide, Bhopal.
Notification (Annexure P-19) u/s 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred as the Act) was issued on 27-6-2002. The petitioner submitted an objection u/s 5(A) and raised several issues on 8-7-2002. The objections under section5(A) were rejected. The declaration u/s 6 was published on 23-11-2002. The purpose mentioned in the notification issued u/s 4 and declaration made u/s 6 in tree plantation for the purpose of BMHRC.
It is averred in the petition that petitioner is a registered co-operative housing society having its bye-laws (Annex. P. 2). There are 785 members of the petitioner/society. 500 of them are severely affected by Bhopal Gas Tragedy and are displaced persons belonging to the weaker section of the society. Petitioner had purchased 23.08
A. Sanjeevi Naidu, etc. Vs. State of Madras and Another
Union of India and Others Vs. Jaswant Rai Kochhar and Others
Collectors of 24 Parganas and Others Vs. Lalit Mohan Mullick and Others
S.S. Darshan Vs. State of Karnataka and others
State of Maharashtra Vs. Mahadeo Deoman Rai alias Kalal and Others
Bejoy Lakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and Others
Ramniklal N. Bhutta and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Bhagat Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Mela Ram and Others Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others
Nimar Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. The Land Acquisition Officer and Others
Raipur Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.