IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BENCH
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Girraj Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Girraj Yadav and Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 287 of 2021
Decided On : 25-01-2021
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Bail - Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 436 of IPC and Sections 3(2)(v), 3(2)(iv), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed a second Criminal Appeal for grant of bail under Section 14-A of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after the first appeal was dismissed. The appellant was arrested for various offenses including those under IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant's ill-health was cited as the reason for the appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the appellant's medical condition was deteriorating, but considering the serious nature of the allegations against the appellant, it dismissed the appeal for bail.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail considering his deteriorating health and the serious nature of the allegations against him.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the appellant's medical reports and the directions issued by the Supreme Court for his treatment. It also took into account the serious nature of the allegations against the appellant.
Final Decision: The Criminal Appeal for grant of bail was dismissed by the Court.
JUDGMENT :
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Heard through video conferencing
1. Case Diary is available.
2. This second Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed for grant of bail. First Criminal Appeal for grant of bail which was registered as Criminal Appeal No. 5639/2020, was dismissed on 09/11/2020.
3. The appellant has been arrested on 26/08/2020 in connection with Crime No. 108/2020 registered at Police Station Bahadurpur, District Ashok Nagar for offence under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 436 of IPC and under Sections 3(2)(v), 3(2)(iv), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
4. The first Criminal Appeal was filed merely on the ground of ill-health. After considering the medical documents filed by the appellant, this Court by order dated 09/11/2020 dismissed the criminal appeal with a direction to the State that in case, if any treatment is required, then the same shall be provided to the appellant without any failure.
5. Being aggrieved by the order dated 09/11/2020 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 5639/2020, the appellant preferred a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 6025/2020 which was dismissed by the Supreme Court by order dated 14/12/2020, with the following observations:-
Mr. Saurabh Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioner will be referred to AIIMS at Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh within this week for assessment and if necessary, for further treatment, as per the norms prescribed in that regard.
In view of the statement, nothing more is required to be done in this Special Leave Petition, at this stage.
Depending on the assessment of AIIMS at Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh further course of action can be decided by the jail authorities, as per law.
The Special Leave Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of."
6. It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that the appellant had moved an application under Section 366 of the Jail Manual before the Special Judge, Ashok Nagar. The Medical Officer, Jail Dispensary, Central Jail, Bhopal, by his medical report dated 28/12/2020 has opined that the Court may consider the release of the appellant under Section 366 of the Jail Manual. However, the said application has been rejected by order dated 28/12/2020. It is further submitted that since the physical condition of the appellant is deteriorating day-by-day, therefore, he may be granted bail.
7. Per contra, the Criminal Appeal is vehemently opposed by the Counsel for the State.
8. By referring to the medical report dated 23/12/2020 sent by the Medical Officer, Jail Dispensary, Central Jail, Bhopal, it was submitted that it was nowhere mentioned by the Medical Officer that the appellant may be released under Section 366 of the Jail Manual. It is submitted that in paragraph 14 of the report, it was specifically mentioned that in case if the detenue is referred to Higher Centre/Medanta Hospital, New Delhi, then patient is got examined in AIIMS, New Delhi and this procedure is adopted in all the cases.
9. It is further submitted that the medical documents which have been filed by the appellant clearly show that prior to his arrest, he had never undergone such extensive medical treatment. It is further submitted that the Supreme Court while dismissing the SLP (Crl.) filed by the appellant, has taken care of health of the appellant and has already issued necessary instructions which shall be followed with all sincerity. It is further submitted that even otherwise, the allegations against the appellant are that he had caused an injury on the head of the deceased by means of a farsa and the appellant is the main accused.
10. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
11. The appellant had filed an application under Section 366 of the Jail Manual on 23/12/2020 and on the same
The seriousness of the allegations against an accused and their medical condition are important factors in deciding whether to grant bail.
At the stage of bail, the court cannot appreciate the evidence led before the Trial Court, and previous dismissals of criminal appeals on merits may impact the consideration of a current appeal.
The court granted bail based on the nature of allegations, period of detention, and the arrest of the main accused, in line with the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in a similar case.
The court's decision was influenced by the consideration of the period of detention, the appellant's criminal history, and the likelihood of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case in a....
Permanent bail on medical grounds overrides statutory bail restrictions when severe health conditions justify such relief.
The examination of the victim is a crucial factor in considering bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offenses and the stage of the trial.
Lack of prosecution and interest by the applicant can lead to dismissal of a bail application.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.