ORDER :

Sanjay Dwivedi, J.

1. Since learned counsel for the parties are ready to argue the matter finally in physical hearing, therefore, it is heard finally.

2. By the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the orders dated 20.04.2015 (Annexure-P/1) passed by respondent No. 3/Sub Divisional Officer, Harda being a Disciplinary Authority, whereby a penalty of dismissal from service upon the petitioner has been inflicted; the order dated 28.09.2016 (Annexure-P/2) passed by respondent No. 2/Collector, District Harda, whereby an appeal preferred by the petitioner against her order of dismissal, has been rejected by the Appellate Authority by affirming the order passed by respondent No. 3/Sub Divisional Officer, Harda and further the order dated 11.09.2017 (Annexure-P/3) passed by the Commissioner, Narmadapuram Division, Hoshangabad, whereby an appeal preferred by the petitioner invoking Rule 29 of the Madhya Pradesh (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 (in short the 'Rules, 1966') against the order of respondent No. 2/Collector, District Harda has also been rejected.

3. The rel