SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 247

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH (JABALPUR BENCH)
RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY, J.
Yogendra Singh Chahar and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Ekta Chahar and Ors. - Respondents
Misc. Criminal Case No. 4198 of 2018
Decided On : 16-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Abhijeet Awasthi.
For the Respondent: Prashant Singh, Sr. Counsel, Anshul Tiwari and Anshul Mishra, P.L.

The main legal point established is that the power to quash criminal proceedings should be sparingly exercised and only in rare cases where the allegations are absurd or do not disclose a cognizable offence. The court emphasized the need for evidence to decide the veracity of the allegations and the importance of not evaluating the allegations on merits at the quashing stage.

Headnote:

Section 482 - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - IPC 498A, 34 - [Sections 498A, 34 of IPC] - The court discussed the power of quashing a criminal proceeding under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the criteria for exercising such power as laid down by the Apex Court. It emphasized that the power should be sparingly exercised and only in rare cases where the allegations are absurd or do not disclose a cognizable offence. The court also highlighted the importance of not evaluating the allegations on merits at the quashing stage and the need for evidence to decide the veracity of the allegations.

Fact of the Case:

The petition was filed to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 34 of IPC. The complainant alleged mental and physical harassment by the applicants, who sought to quash the proceedings based on vague allegations and delay in filing the complaint.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that specific allegations of demand for money and harassment were mentioned in the FIR and case diary statements, prima facie constituting an offence under section 498A of IPC. It dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the veracity of the allegations cannot be ascertained at the quashing stage and should be evaluated with evidence.

Issues: The issues revolved around the sufficiency of allegations to constitute an offence under section 498A of IPC, the timing of the complaint, and the demand for quashing criminal proceedings based on vague allegations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the power to quash criminal proceedings should be sparingly exercised and only in rare cases where the allegations are absurd or do not disclose a cognizable offence. It highlighted the need for evidence to decide the veracity of the allegations and the importance of not evaluating the allegations on merits at the quashing stage.

Final Decision: The petition to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 34 of IPC was dismissed, allowing the applicants to raise their pleas before the Trial Court at an appropriate stage.

ORDER :

Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J.

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of criminal proceedings arising out from the Crime No. 192/2017 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Bhopal for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 34 of IPC.

2. Brief facts of the case which are relevant for the disposal of this case are that on 04/11/2017 complainant/non applicant no. 1 Ekta Chahar lodged a report at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Bhopal which reads as under:-

    ^^eSa efgyk Fkkuk Hkksiky es lmfu- ds in ij inLFk gwa Qfj;kfn;k Jhefr ,drk pkgj ifr ;ksxsUnz flag pkgj mez 31 lky fuoklh e-u- 50 QkÃu ,osU;w Qsl 1 u;kiqjk dksykj jksM Hkksiky us fnukad 4@11@17 dks Fkkuk mifLFkr vkdj Fkkuk izHkkjh egksn; ds uke ij ,d vkosnu vius ifr] ;ksxsUnz flag pkgj] llqj yky flag pkgj] lkl lRrks pkgj] tsB eksgu flag pkgj] tsBkuh vatyh flag pkgj }kjk ngst dh ekax dks ysdj 'kkjhfjd o ekufld #i ls izrkfM+r djus ds laca/k esaA is'k fd;k gS ftldh tkap ij vijk/k /kkjk 498,] 34 Hkknfo] dk ik;k tkus ls dk;e dj foospuk esa fy;k x;k udy vkosnu i= fuEukuqlkj gSA izfr Jheku Fkkuk izHkkjh efgyk Fkkuk Hkksiky] fo"k; % ifr] ;ksxsUnz flag pkgj] llqj yky flag pkgj] lkl lRrks pkgj] tsB eksgu flag pkgj] tsBkuh vatyh flag pkgj }kjk ngst dh ekax dks ysdj 'kkjhfjd o ekufld #i ls izrkfM+r djus ds laca/k esaA egksn;] fuosnu gS fd eSa Jhefr ,drk pkgj ifr ;ksxsUnz flag pkgj mez 31 lky fuoklh e-u- 50 QkÃu ,osU;w Qsl 1 u;kiqjk dksykj jksM Hkksiky fuosnu djrh gwa fd esjh 'kknh fnukad 01@06@2009 dks ;ksxsUnz flag pkgj firk yky flag pkgj fuoklh ch 58 iscy cs gksEl ckx eqxfy;k eqy fuokl fofn'kk ¼e-iz-½ ds lkFk lkekftd jhfr fjokt ds gqà Fkh 'kknh esa esjs firk us x`gLFkh dk lHkh lkeku o uxn lk i10 SPORTS dkj ¼lks ekjihV djrs Fks ekufld izrkM+uk nsrs jgs gSa dgrs gS rqEgs NksM+ nwaxk rqe ikxy gks vkSj esjs cPps dks Hkh esjs f[kYkkQ esjk ifr HkM+dkrk gSA dgrk gS rsjh ek¡ ikxy gS esjk cPpk gksus ds ckn lu~ 2011 esa esjh rfc;r [kjkc gks xà rks xk;=h gkWfLiVy jryke esa esjs ifr us bykt djk;k Fkk esjs firk us bykt ds iSls fn;s Fks ogka jryke esa esjs firk us lekt ds yksxksa dks cqykdj esjs ifr o mlds ifjtuksa dks le>kÃ'k nh Fkh mu yksxksa us esjh fcekjh dks ysdj esjs firk o lekt ds yksxksa ds lkeus Hkkjh gaxkek fd;k Fkk MkWDVj us fnekx laca/kh dksà rdyhQ ugha crkà Fkh bykt ds ckn ifr ds ikl jgh fQj 2013 esa esjh vka[k esa rdyhQ Fkh rks eSaus esjs ifr ls eq>s MkWDVj dks fn[kkus dks dgk Fkk ijUrq mUgksaus ugha fn[kk;k esjs firk ds ?kj Hkst fn;k esjs firk us esjh vka[k dk Ãykt djk;k Fkk o ltZjh gqà Fkh s lkFk ysdj esjs ifr ds ?kj jryke tkdj esjs ifr dks lksus dk czslysV nsdj vk;s eq>s muds ikl NksM+dj vk;s mlds ckn dqN 'kkafr gqà Fkh ijUrq dqN fnu ckn fQj esjs ifr eq>s ijs'kku djus yxs eSa esjs ifr ds ?kj ij gh Fkh ekg eà 2017 eSa esjs ifr dk LFkkukarj.k Hkksiky gks x;k esjs ifr fdjk;s ds edku esa isCcy cs ch 58 es jgrs gS ifr ds lkFk yxHkx nks ekg jgh esjk ifr mlds ekrk firk Hkkà vkSj HkkHkh eq>s 'kkjhfjd vkSj ekufld #i ls izrkfM+r djrs Fks vkSj fnukad 10@07@17 dks esjs ifr us eq>s ekjihV dj ?kj ls ckgj fudky fn;k ?kj es rkyk yxk fn;k eSa vius cPps ds lkFk ckgj ikdZ es cSBdj firk dks Qksu yxkà esjs firkth ds lkFk mudh dkj esa cSBdj dsoy ,d tksM+s diM+s esa cPps ds lkFk firk ds ?kj 50 QkÃu ,osU;w vk xà firk ds ?kj ij gwa eSa vius ifr o mlds ifjtuksa dh ekufld izrkM+uk ds dkj.k eSa ekufld #i ls vkgr gqà ftldk Ãykt djk;k Fkk vkosnu nsrh gwaA dk;Zokgh pkgrh gwa dk;Zokgh dh tkosaA**

3. On that police registered Crime No. 192/2017 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A/34 of the IPC against the applicants and after investigation filed charge-sheet against the applicants before the learned JMFC Bhopal. Being aggrieved from that applicants have filed this petition for quashing of criminal proceedings arising out from the Crime No. 192/2017 registered at Police Station-Mahila Thana, District-Bhopal for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 34 of IPC.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicant No. 1

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top