S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Ashok Makhija – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
S.A. Dharmadhikari, J.
1. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.
2. The present petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
(ii) That, the respondent's police authority be further directed not to harass the petitioner and his family members based on the frivolous allegation made by the accused persons against them and restrain themselves from leaking false news to the press against the petitioner and his family members.
(iii) That, the other relief doing justice including cost of awarded."
3. Brief facts leading to filing of this petition are that on 16/2/2021 the petitioner lodged an FIR against the accused persons namely Babita and Gagandeep, his tenants, alleging commission of theft of cash and gold jewelry. Based thereupon, Crime has been registered against the accused persons at Crime No. 74/21 for the offences punishable under sections 380 and 454 of the IPC. After registration of FI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.