SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 574

ANAND PATHAK
Bakhar Husain – Appellant
Versus
The State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Anil Kumar Shrivastava for petitioner; Devendra Choubey, Government Advocate for respondent/state.

ORDER

1. The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays for the following reliefs:-

“7.1 That, a direction may kindly be given to the respondents to give the service benefit and pay scale of the post of the permanent classified Painter from the date of his classification as permanent employee to the petitioner and pay the arrears of salary on fixation of pay along with all consequence benefits with interest from the date of his classification.

7.2 That, the respondents may further be directed to treat the petitioner at par with their similarly placed co-employees with seniority and consequential benefits on the post of Painter from the date of his classification.

7.3 That, any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper and may also be given to the petitioner alongwith costs.”

2. It is submitted that the petitioner was appointed as a daily wage employee to the post of Chokidar in the respondents' department on 1.10.1993. The petitioner has been discharging his duties with honesty and sincerity. The petitioner has been declared as a classified permanent employee on the post of Chokidar by the order of respondent No.4 vide order date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top