SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 25

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Raju @ Rajendra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava, for applicant; A.K. Nirankari for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision under sections 397, 401 of CrPC has been filed against the order dated 20.12.2019 passed by Third Additional Sessions Judge, Ganjbasoda, Distt. Vidisha in Sessions Trial No.41/2019, by which the charges under sections 323/34, 307/34, 302/34 of IPC have been framed.

2. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that a Dehati Nalishi was lodged by Shailendra Dangi that on 4.5.2019 he along with his friends Ankit Panthi, Abhishek Raghuvanshi and Anshul Sharma had gone to Bombay Vilas Dhabha for having their meals. It was around 09:30 in the night. Co-accused Chhotu @ Sanjeev Baghel, his friend Shubham Raghuvanshi and Roshan Rajpoot, came on a Scooty. They came to the complainant and started alleging as to why they are staring at them and on this issue, fight took place between the parties. Shubham assaulted on the forehead of the complainant Shailendra Dangi, as a result, he sustained injuries. Accordingly, he was taken to medical store for his treatment. Accused Chhotu @ Sanjeev Baghel, Roshan and Shubham also came on the Scooty and the co-accused Chhotu @ Sanjeev Baghel fired a gunshot causing injury on the chest of Anshul Sharma. Co-accused Rosh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top