SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 10

SUBODH ABHYANKAR, ANIL VERMA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Preeti Patidar – Respondent


Advocates:
Aditya Garg, Govt. Advocate for appellants/State;
Jitendra Verma for respondents.

ORDER

Abhyankar, J:- 1. This order shall govern the disposal of writ appeal No.949/2021 and writ appeal No.951/2021 as both the appeals have arisen out of the common order dated 23.6.2021 passed by the leaned single judge in W.P. No.17964/2020 and W.P. No.6332/2021 respectively. For the convenience, the facts as narrated in W.A. No.949/2021 (W.P. No.17964/2020) are being taken into consideration.

2. This appeal under section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchha Nayaylalya (Khand Nyaypith Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 has been filed by the appellants/State against the order dated 23/06/2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No.17964/2020 by which the petition filed by the petitioner/respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') has been allowed with cost of Rs.15,000/-, quashing the order dated 5.10.2020 passed by the appellate authority- Commissioner, Ujjain, Division Ujjain which affirmed the order dated 28.11.2020 passed by the Collector, Ujjain whereby the respondent No.1/petitioner was removed from the post of Pradhan. and consequently the recovery effected from the petitioner/respondent was also quashed being not sustainable. The review petition No.553/2021 filed by the St

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top