SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 73

SUBODH ABHYANKAR, SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Durgesh Rathi (Dr. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
L.C. Patne for appellant;
Aditya Garg, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

Abhyankar, J. -- 1. This Writ Appeal has been preferred under section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, against the order dated 8.7.2021 passed by the learned Judge of the Writ Court in Writ Petition No.13815/2020.

2. The case of the appellant/petitioner before the writ Court was that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Insurance Medical Officer by order dated 15.5.1989. Vide order dated 12.9.1992 he was confirmed into the service. After rendering 30 years of qualifying service, he submitted his application on 12.12.2019, seeking voluntary retirement from service, in a prescribed format i.e. Form-28 under rule 42(1)(a) of the M.P Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 ( for short ‘the Rules of 1976’). The application was forwarded by the Director, E.S.I.C. to the Secretary, Labour Department with the endorsement that no show cause notice/disciplinary proceedings or recovery are pending against the petitioner. The period of notice expired on 29.2.2020, but by that time the Government had imposed Essential Service

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top